On Wed, 20 Apr 2011 22:45:31 +0200 Stefan Tauner stefan.tauner@student.tuwien.ac.at wrote:
On Wed, 20 Apr 2011 22:00:41 +0200 Idwer Vollering vidwer@gmail.com wrote:
2011/3/15 Stefan Tauner stefan.tauner@student.tuwien.ac.at:
Signed-off-by: Stefan Tauner stefan.tauner@student.tuwien.ac.at
Acked-by: Idwer Vollering vidwer@gmail.com
But *only* if the probe/read/erase/write status is not affected.
the only difference between the non-n version and the n version is, that the reset pin of the n version is not connected. do we even use the hardware reset? if not this should not change anything.
ps: the difference between B and T is the (non-uniform) sector structure pps: i have a MX29F002NTPC-12, but i dont have any indication that i have tested it for full PREW. there was a successful test for MX29F001TPC-12 though on the ml (and i have submitted an already acked patch for it). want me to test it "again"?
i have finally added this to my tested stuff branch and will commit it later. thanks for the review idwer!