Am Freitag, den 26.02.2010, 11:34 +0100 schrieb Michael Karcher:
One release goal was to have pending patches committed. Especially with the board enables, I am needing reviews to commit them, or we soften the rules for board enable commits even further.
The tested/not tested state is about http://patchwork.coreboot.org/patch/988/ which could use a review too. I know it's already bitrotted (doesn't apply anymore) after I committed the VL400 board enable.
Abit IP35 Pro: http://patchwork.coreboot.org/patch/843/
- Board enable works, but we have one report that the BIOS backflashes
itself. No idea what happens.
No two BIOS chips on board. flashrom/lspci/superiotool: http://www.coreboot.org/pipermail/flashrom/2010-January/001837.html Ack: received privately after flashing succeeded, before reboot. Plan: Commit in "not tested" state, using the Ack received in private mail. I can bounce the Ack mail to the list if you like.
Abit VT6X4: http://patchwork.coreboot.org/patch/955/ depending on http://patchwork.coreboot.org/patch/948/
- Board enable works: http://coreboot.pastebin.com/f6fd7daa3
IMHO ready for commit. Review of the 948 appreciated.
Uwe wanted to take a look at 948 flashrom/lspci/superiotool: http://coreboot.pastebin.com/f5f25f1cf Ack: no formal ACK. The user doesn't like to have real name / email address in the flashrom log. Plan: Commit in "tested" state. Ack by some developer needed per signoff procedure. Waiting for Uwe's Ack on 948.
HP Vectra VL420SFF: http://patchwork.coreboot.org/patch/919/
- Board enable works, but DMI identifier was not tested. Confirmation
for non-DMI is at http://patchwork.coreboot.org/patch/696/
flashrom/lspci/superiotool: http://www.coreboot.org/pipermail/flashrom/2009-December/001440.html Ack: pinged user again. Last ping request got only to the flashrom list, forgot to Cc: the user. Plan: Wait some days for an Ack, commit in "tested" state.
Intel SE440BX-2: http://patchwork.coreboot.org/patch/842/
- Board enable does not work. GPO register on PIIX4 is for strange
reasons read-only, see http://www.flashrom.org/pipermail/flashrom/2010-February/002272.html
flashrom/lspci/superiotool: http://www.coreboot.org/pipermail/flashrom/2010-January/001988.html Ack: None, as the patch doesn't work. Plan: Unsure, because "broken" is not an option, only tested/not tested.
HP Vectra VL400: http://patchwork.coreboot.org/patch/721/
- Board enable works, I was unsure about match quality. But
http://pastebin.com/f6c509179 claims that both IDs I used for matching are really VL400 specific.
Already committed.
Asus M2NBP-VM CSM: http://patchwork.coreboot.org/patch/717/
- Board enable works, only confirmation was on IRC. No response on
ping.
flashrom/lspci/superiotool: http://www.coreboot.org/pipermail/flashrom/2009-December/001373.html Ack: None, user unresponsive. Plan: Commit in "tested" state. Ack by some developer needed per signoff procedure.
MSI MS7207: http://patchwork.coreboot.org/patch/659/
- Untested. User got impatient and used another way of flashing - no
response on ping.
flashrom/lspci/superiotool: http://www.coreboot.org/pipermail/flashrom/2009-December/001301.html Ack: None, user unresponsive Plan: Commit in "not tested" state. Ack by some developer needed per signoff procedure.
Thanks in advance for any reviews.
Regards, Michael Karcher