Re: [flashrom] [RFC] libflashrom design choices

[Stefan Reinauer]

Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote:
> On 16.09.2009 10:28, Stefan Reinauer wrote:
> > Stefan Reinauer wrote:
> > > Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote:
> > > > since the request to turn flashrom into a library pops up from time to
> > > > time, we have to make sure the flashrom code doesn't have any nasty
> > > > surprises.
> > >
> > > [..]
> > > possibly a libpci abstraction, or libpci emulation in libpayload
>
> Definitely. Some people have also suggested to use libpciaccess instead
> of libpci. Either way, we need to improve the abstraction.

Doesn't look much easier to use than libpci... What's the benefit?