Hi flashrom folks,
working again on implementing the libflashrom interface described here [1]. During review [2] the question arose what `fl_` means and if we don't want to use something else. The following alternatives were pro- posed in the wiki:
* fl_ / FL_ (probably *fl*ashrom) * lf_ / LF_ (*l*ib *f*lashrom) * lfr_ / LFR_ (*l*ib *f*lash *r*om) * rom_ / ROM_
IIRC, on IRC the following was proposed:
* fr_ / FR_ (*f*lash *r*om)
I don't think it has to be an acronym, so I'd add:
* flash_ / FLASH_ * flashrom_ / FLASHROM_
My personal preference would be either `fr_` or `flash_`.
I think this will be open for discussion only for few days. Moving forward is currently more important than finding the perfect name.
Best regards, Nico
[1] https://www.flashrom.org/Libflashrom [2] https://review.coreboot.org/#/c/17946/