Hi Matthias,
thanks, we're making a lot of progress.
On 18.08.2010 13:31, Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote:
Hi Matthias,
thanks for the test. Can you repeat the test with the following patch?
On 18.08.2010 13:04, Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote:
Hi Matthias, hi Hony,
you are both seeing a very similar issue. This mail contains a patch which should add the debugging we need.
New patch, with additional error checks.
Add paranoid checks for the essential readcnt/writecnt registers in the SB600/SB700/... SPI driver. This will detect most concurrent access, but not all.
I would love to see the logs in double verbose mode for a read:
flashrom -VV -r broken_fifo1.bin >broken_fifo1.txt 2>&1
Signed-off-by: Carl-Daniel Hailfinger c-d.hailfinger.devel.2006@gmx.net
Index: flashrom-sb600_spi_paranoia_concurrent_access/sb600spi.c =================================================================== --- flashrom-sb600_spi_paranoia_concurrent_access/sb600spi.c (Revision 1144) +++ flashrom-sb600_spi_paranoia_concurrent_access/sb600spi.c (Arbeitskopie) @@ -58,10 +58,36 @@ { mmio_writeb(mmio_readb(sb600_spibar + 2) | 0x10, sb600_spibar + 2);
+ /* FIXME: This loop makes no sense at all. */ while (mmio_readb(sb600_spibar + 0xD) & 0x7) msg_pspew("reset\n"); }
+static int compare_internal_fifo_pointer(uint8_t want) +{ + uint8_t tmp; + + tmp = mmio_readb(sb600_spibar + 0xd) & 0x07; + if ((want & 0x7) != tmp) { + msg_perr("SB600 FIFO pointer corruption! Pointer is %d, wanted " + "%d\nPlease make sure that nothing else accesses the " + "flash chip at the same time.\n", tmp, want); + return 1; + } else { + msg_pspew("SB600 FIFO pointer is %d, wanted %d\n", tmp, want); + return 0; + } +} + +static int reset_compare_internal_fifo_pointer(uint8_t want) +{ + int ret; + + ret = compare_internal_fifo_pointer(want); + reset_internal_fifo_pointer(); + return ret; +} + static void execute_command(void) { mmio_writeb(mmio_readb(sb600_spibar + 2) | 1, sb600_spibar + 2); @@ -77,6 +103,7 @@ /* First byte is cmd which can not being sent through FIFO. */ unsigned char cmd = *writearr++; unsigned int readoffby1; + unsigned char readwrite;
writecnt--;
@@ -102,15 +129,17 @@ * It is unclear if the CS# line is set high too early as well. */ readoffby1 = (writecnt) ? 0 : 1; - mmio_writeb((readcnt + readoffby1) << 4 | (writecnt), sb600_spibar + 1); + readwrite = (readcnt + readoffby1) << 4 | (writecnt); + mmio_writeb(readwrite, sb600_spibar + 1); mmio_writeb(cmd, sb600_spibar + 0);
/* Before we use the FIFO, reset it first. */ reset_internal_fifo_pointer();
/* Send the write byte to FIFO. */ + msg_pspew("Writing: "); for (count = 0; count < writecnt; count++, writearr++) { - msg_pspew(" [%x]", *writearr); + msg_pspew("[%02x]", *writearr); mmio_writeb(*writearr, sb600_spibar + 0xC); } msg_pspew("\n"); @@ -119,8 +148,9 @@ * We should send the data by sequence, which means we need to reset * the FIFO pointer to the first byte we want to send. */ - reset_internal_fifo_pointer(); + reset_compare_internal_fifo_pointer(writecnt);
+ msg_pspew("Executing: \n"); execute_command();
/* @@ -134,22 +164,34 @@ * the opcode, the FIFO already stores the response from the chip. * Usually, the chip will respond with 0x00 or 0xff. */ - reset_internal_fifo_pointer(); + reset_compare_internal_fifo_pointer(writecnt + readcnt);
/* Skip the bytes we sent. */ + msg_pspew("Skipping: "); for (count = 0; count < writecnt; count++) { cmd = mmio_readb(sb600_spibar + 0xC); - msg_pspew("[ %2x]", cmd); + msg_pspew("[%02x]", cmd); } + msg_pspew("\n"); + compare_internal_fifo_pointer(writecnt);
- msg_pspew("The FIFO pointer after skipping is %d.\n", - mmio_readb(sb600_spibar + 0xd) & 0x07); + msg_pspew("Reading: "); for (count = 0; count < readcnt; count++, readarr++) { *readarr = mmio_readb(sb600_spibar + 0xC); msg_pspew("[%02x]", *readarr); } msg_pspew("\n"); + reset_compare_internal_fifo_pointer(readcnt + writecnt);
+ if (mmio_readb(sb600_spibar + 1) != readwrite) { + msg_perr("Unexpected change in SB600 read/write count! " + "Something else is accessing the flash chip and " + "causes random corruption. Please stop all " + "applications and drivers which access the flash " + "chip.\n"); + /* FIXME: Abort here? */ + } + return 0; }
@@ -158,6 +200,10 @@ struct pci_dev *smbus_dev; uint32_t tmp; uint8_t reg; + const char *speed_names[4] = { + "Reserved", "33", "22", "16.5" + }; + /* Read SPI_BaseAddr */ tmp = pci_read_long(dev, 0xa0); tmp &= 0xffffffe0; /* remove bits 4-0 (reserved) */ @@ -183,15 +229,25 @@ msg_pdbg("PrefetchEnSPIFromIMC=%i, ", tmp);
tmp = pci_read_byte(dev, 0xbb); + /* FIXME: Set bit 3,6,7 if not already set. + * Set bit 5, otherwise SPI accesses are pointless in LPC mode. + * See doc 42413 AMD SB700/710/750 RPR. + */ msg_pdbg("PrefetchEnSPIFromHost=%i, SpiOpEnInLpcMode=%i\n", tmp & 0x1, (tmp & 0x20) >> 5); tmp = mmio_readl(sb600_spibar); + /* FIXME: If SpiAccessMacRomEn or SpiHostAccessRomEn are zero on + * SB700 or later, reads and writes will be corrupted. Abort in this + * case. Make sure to avoid this check on SB600. + */ msg_pdbg("SpiArbEnable=%i, SpiAccessMacRomEn=%i, " "SpiHostAccessRomEn=%i, ArbWaitCount=%i, " "SpiBridgeDisable=%i, DropOneClkOnRd=%i\n", (tmp >> 19) & 0x1, (tmp >> 22) & 0x1, (tmp >> 23) & 0x1, (tmp >> 24) & 0x7, (tmp >> 27) & 0x1, (tmp >> 28) & 0x1); + tmp = (mmio_readb(sb600_spibar + 0xd) >> 4) & 0x3; + msg_pdbg("NormSpeed is %s MHz\n", speed_names[tmp]);
/* Look for the SMBus device. */ smbus_dev = pci_dev_find(0x1002, 0x4385);