Am 27.10.2012 17:38 schrieb Stefan Tauner:
On Thu, 9 Aug 2012 01:01:30 +0200 Stefan Tauner stefan.tauner@student.tuwien.ac.at wrote:
This introduces a small output change: previously we printed ERASE or VERIFY depending on the callee. This special case has been dropped because it is unnecessary to print it (and wrong for the verification function to need to know why it is verifying exactly). If an erase fails we mention that fact explicitly already, similar for verify.
I'm not convinced yet. I'll try to compare the failure output with and without this patch before I ack.
1/4 year is too long. committed in r1619.
Point taken. Thanks for merging this.
Regards, Carl-Daniel