On Thu, 26 May 2011 01:34:28 +0200 Carl-Daniel Hailfinger c-d.hailfinger.devel.2006@gmx.net wrote:
Am 25.05.2011 18:19 schrieb Stefan Tauner:
On Tue, 24 May 2011 09:01:13 +0200 Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote:
Am 24.05.2011 02:21 schrieb Stefan Tauner:
- int status;
- int status; /* OK=0 and NT=1 are defines only. Beware! */
Do we want an enum instead?
i like strong types, but i dont care too much in this case.
If we use an enum here, we should also use an enum everywhere else for tested/untested.
besides being work, this does not sound as being a bad thing to me (yet) :)
Looks good, thanks for addressing the review comments. I assume you tested that the output still looks OK and that it compiles. Acked-by: Carl-Daniel Hailfinger c-d.hailfinger.devel.2006@gmx.net
Please go ahead and commit.
thanks, r1318