Am 30.06.2011 22:37 schrieb Stefan Tauner:
add count_usable_erasers which returns the number of well-defined erasers for a chip
This can be used in various situations (including one in the upcoming SFDP patch) and removes one FIXME in current HEAD. Needed to add a declaration of check_block_eraser.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Tauner stefan.tauner@student.tuwien.ac.at
diff --git a/flashrom.c b/flashrom.c index 13d398e..10035c4 100644 --- a/flashrom.c +++ b/flashrom.c @@ -1818,13 +1830,13 @@ int chip_safety_check(struct flashchip *flash, int force, int read_it, int write } if (erase_it || write_it) { /* Write needs erase. */
if (flash->tested & TEST_BAD_ERASE) {
if (flash->tested & TEST_BAD_ERASE ||
!count_usable_erasers(flash, 0)) {
Please split that if statement. Allowing --force makes sense for TEST_BAD_ERASE, but it makes no sense if no erase functions are present. You can reuse the error message, the compiler/linker will only store the string once.
msg_cerr("Erase is not working on this chip. "); if (!force) return 1; msg_cerr("Continuing anyway.\n"); }
} if (write_it) { if (flash->tested & TEST_BAD_WRITE) {/* FIXME: Check if at least one erase function exists. */
With the split if statement, this is Acked-by: Carl-Daniel Hailfinger c-d.hailfinger.devel.2006@gmx.net
Regards, Carl-Daniel