On Sun, 11 Sep 2011 16:23:13 +0200 Uwe Hermann uwe@hermann-uwe.de wrote:
On Thu, Sep 08, 2011 at 11:44:23PM +0200, Stefan Tauner wrote:
Signed-off-by: Stefan Tauner stefan.tauner@student.tuwien.ac.at
Acked-by: Uwe Hermann uwe@hermann-uwe.de
Useful IMHO, and works fine (no double-prints without -V or -VV or -VVV).
thanks. it had a major problem with -f. it would print "Assuming..." then although nothing was assumed but a/the chip was really found. if a chip is force we could never arrived there and the variable force does not indicate assumption at all.
carldani does not veto this one, but is not too happy with it. while i agree that duplicating code AND output is not a good idea in general it is an improvement in this case. hopefully we can get rid of it again later, when verbosely probing is less verbose.
committed in r1436.