On Sat, 12 May 2012 19:48:43 +0200 Carl-Daniel Hailfinger c-d.hailfinger.devel.2006@gmx.net wrote:
Am 12.05.2012 01:48 schrieb Stefan Tauner:
On Fri, 11 May 2012 07:10:08 +0200 Carl-Daniel Hailfinger c-d.hailfinger.devel.2006@gmx.net wrote:
Index: flashrom-message_reorg/cli_classic.c
--- flashrom-message_reorg/cli_classic.c (Revision 1534) +++ flashrom-message_reorg/cli_classic.c (Arbeitskopie) @@ -415,11 +426,17 @@ if (prog == PROGRAMMER_INVALID) prog = default_programmer;
- msg_gdbg("Command line:");
- for (i = 0; i < argc; i++) {
msg_gdbg(" %s", argv[i]);additional " " would ease debugging really stupid shell problems, but would make it less readable in almost all circumstances. making them appear in -VVV output would be an option but waaaay too overkill... sorry that little prefectionist[1] crept out again ;)
./flashrom -p dummy:emulate=MX25L6436,spi_status=0x1 -V -c "SFDP-capable chip" -w bla [...] Command line: ./flashrom -p dummy:emulate=MX25L6436,spi_status=0x1 -V -c SFDP-capable chip -w bla
note the missing " on the -c option.
Can be debugged easily with the new argument count in the command line echo.
i beg to differ (while the count adds some information, that's a quite cumbersome way to debug it :), but i dont think it is a big issue. together with the actual error or warning message it should be obvious enough.
Signed-off-by: Carl-Daniel Hailfinger c-d.hailfinger.devel.2006@gmx.net
[…]
everything else seems undisputed now, so... still Acked-by: Stefan Tauner stefan.tauner@student.tuwien.ac.at :)