On 06/20/2011 03:45 PM, Stefan Tauner wrote:
On Sun, 19 Jun 2011 22:54:31 -0500 "Colin L. Rice"dah4k0r@gmail.com wrote:
Sorry for missing you guys earlier. It works.
Note that this is an EP-9NPa7I. But eh whatever.
jup i am aware of that. i have a fix for the "misdetection", but it was on purpose that i let you try the 0x92 patch without that fix. thanks a lot for your testing! your board will be supported in one way or another by the next release.
Output:
flashrom v0.9.3-r1338 on Linux 2.6.38-8-generic (x86_64), built with libpci 3.1.7, GCC 4.5.2, little endian flashrom is free software, get the source code at http://www.flashrom.org
Calibrating delay loop... delay loop is unreliable, trying to continue OK. Found chipset "NVIDIA CK804", enabling flash write... OK. This chipset supports the following protocols: Non-SP. Disabling flash write protection for board "EPoX EP-8NPA7I"... OK. Found chip "SST SST49LF004A/B" (512 kB, FWH) at physical address 0xfff80000. Flash image seems to be a legacy BIOS. Disabling coreboot-related checks. Erasing and writing flash chip... Done. Verifying flash... VERIFIED.
so. the patch from jonathan works for this board too (besides the EP-8NPA7I and a bunch of others according to him). the question now is if we want to enable it for all ck804 boards by default (i.e. ack the patch as is), or if we wanna put it in a board enable. i think it is ok to apply it as is, even if we are not 100% sure it is safe everywhere. please speak out now if you differ before i ack it.
I've seen this in at least 3 board enables recently, so: Acked-by: Joshua Roys roysjosh@gmail.com
Thanks Jonathan and Stefan!
Josh