Re: [flashrom] [PATCH/RFC] finish jedec converstion

[Sean Nelson]

On 1/25/2010 10:46 AM, Sean Nelson wrote:
> On 1/25/2010 9:40 AM, Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote:
> > Ummm... technically, the probe function changed (well, in practice the
> > command sequence should be identical). Do we want to keep TEST_OK_PR if
> > the probe function changed?
> >
> > Regards,
> > Carl-Daniel
>
> On 1/24/2010 1:54 PM, Stefan Reinauer wrote:
> > I guess that was done wrong before, but all chips touched like that 
> > need to be changed back to untested unless you retested each of them. 
> > Otherwise the test flags become quite meaningless...
> >
> > Stefan
>
> I'm thinking that Stefan is right: we should change all the chips to 
> TEST_UNTESTED since the last few patches I've written have had radical 
> changes.
> This latest version of the patch reflects that.