On Sat, 18 Jun 2011 15:12:15 +0200 Uwe Hermann uwe@hermann-uwe.de wrote:
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 10:44:43PM +0200, Stefan Tauner wrote:
Signed-off-by: Idwer Vollering vidwer@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Stefan Tauner stefan.tauner@student.tuwien.ac.at
chipset_enable.c | 12 +++++++++--- 1 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/chipset_enable.c b/chipset_enable.c index 3a2febc..5907b86 100644 --- a/chipset_enable.c +++ b/chipset_enable.c @@ -1115,8 +1115,8 @@ const struct penable chipset_enables[] = { […]
{0x8086, 0x2480, OK, "Intel", "ICH3-S", enable_flash_ich_4e}, {0x8086, 0x248c, OK, "Intel", "ICH3-M", enable_flash_ich_4e}, {0x8086, 0x24c0, OK, "Intel", "ICH4/ICH4-L", enable_flash_ich_4e}, {0x8086, 0x24cc, OK, "Intel", "ICH4-M", enable_flash_ich_4e},
{0x8086, 0x24d0, OK, "Intel", "ICH5/ICH5R", enable_flash_ich_4e}, +// {0x8086, 0x24dc, NT, "Intel", "ICH5/ICH5R", enable_flash_ich_4e}, /* http://www.intel.com/assets/pdf/datasheet/252516.pdf */
This is a duplicate entry? I cannot find 0x24dc in the datasheet, 0x24d0 is the correct device ID for ICH5/ICH5R. I'd rather drop this entry for now (and the comment).
me neither, dropped. idwer do you have any idea how this came in?
[…]
Acked-by: Uwe Hermann uwe@hermann-uwe.de
thanks. engineering samples were changed to match the existing line for the ich9 ES. committed in r1343