Am 28.07.2012 16:30 schrieb Stefan Tauner:
On Sat, 03 Mar 2012 23:32:23 +0100 Carl-Daniel Hailfinger c-d.hailfinger.devel.2006@gmx.net wrote:
Is it possible that this patch made the board table one or two tabs wider? The patch looks like that, and while I agree that some files/sections should not have line length limits, adding another 16 columns of whitespace is something I'd like to avoid.
in general the url is the source of length problem. does making the table longer by putting the URL in a line of its own make sense?
It's certainly a novel idea, and it has some appeal.
i personally would drop the URL anyway.. useless, partially misleading (for boards with multiple variants) and work for me (only, as i must emphasize :)
Yes, now that Uwe is essentially a fulltime sigrok developer, he's not maintaining that stuff anymore. What do you think about asking someone else to do the tested_stuff maintenance?
iirc uwe was strongly against this, but i would be lying if would say that his matters much to me in this case (because the tested stuff branch is the most boring work i do for this project, not because i dont respect his view).
Back then the policy was accepted because he handled the board testing maintenance. We might have to rethink this.
Regards, Carl-Daniel