Re: [flashrom] [PATCH] Fix erase-blocks specification for the Atmel AT49F002(N)(T)

[Carl-Daniel Hailfinger]

On 23.01.2010 18:59, Uwe Hermann wrote:
> Anyway, the attached patch is more correct than svn anyway (unless I
> read the datasheet wrong), so we should apply it nevertheless IMHO.

Could you please regenerate the patch with at least 17 lines of context?
Otherwise it is very difficult to review without applying it (no chip
name/ID in the patch).

To generate a diff with 17 lines of context in svn:
svn diff -x -U17 --diff-cmd diff

Thanks!

Regards,
Carl-Daniel