flashrom

flashrom@flashrom.org

5 participants
9161 discussions

About frser-duino baudrate and other stuff (was Re: MX25L6445E erase and write failed!)
by Urja Rannikko 04 Mar '15

04 Mar '15

Hi, >> I got a bit carried away reading the serprog-duino firmware code >> and decided to just see what it'd look like with my frser-* codebase. >> So, fresh out of the oven, and untested (i tested on my m644p before i >> converted it for the m328p): >> https://github.com/urjaman/frser-duino >> To use it: >> git clone git://github.com/urjaman/frser-duino >> cd frser-duino >> make && make program >> >> (the defaults are for the u2 arduino, eg. ttyACM0 and 115200, i didnt >> have time to work the makefile magic that hard.) >> So I heard this works at 115200... I made a change in the Makefile that should allow you to change the speed used by serprog* to something faster, namely 2000000 ;) I think it should be okay - i remember gnutoo claiming the U2 can do it with the delay he had added and i added that to frser-duino uart.c... (* without changing the bootloader speed...) So, if you want to test that, in the frser-duino tree git pull and change the Makefile so it says FRBAUD:=2000000 then make && make program And try out if everything still works. (now with -p serprog:dev=/dev/ttyACM0:2000000 i guess) Also compared to serprog-duino, frser-duino should allow setting SPI frequency ( although the default 8mhz is propably ok) but just in case of long wires... eg -p serprog:dev=/dev/ttyACM0:2000000,spispeed=1M The hardware can do 7 steps between 8 MHz and 125 kHz when the AVR is at 16 Mhz. -- Urja Rannikko

1 0

Re: [flashrom] MX25L6445E erase and write failed!
by Urja Rannikko 04 Mar '15

04 Mar '15

Hi, > I've an idea. Maybe you've managed to switch the MX25L6445E into the > "individual block protection mode" (read the datasheet page 30 - its > an OTP, once done once its for good) and now it isnt actually > erasing/writing anything at all (that 1M just happens to have > succeeded previously) because flashrom currently doesnt know of the > invidividual block unlock commands (or even the GBULK gang block > unlock) and thinks everything is ok because the status register looks > like unlocked. > > So maybe read the current contents into a file and modify a little bit > in the erased area (eg. swap out the first 4k to random data*) and see > if it writes. My theory is it wont. > > *here's example commands: > flashrom <insert your parameters> -r current.bin > dd if=/dev/urandom of=4krandom.bin bs=1024 count=4 > dd if=current.bin bs=1024 skip=4 of=current-4.bin > cat 4krandom.bin current-4.bin > modified.bin > flashrom <parameters> -w modified.bin > > Somebody'd need to write a patch to flashrom to use the RDSCUR command > to see if WPSEL is set to see for sure. But support for this wouldnt > hurt anyways. I'll see if i have time later in the evening to make a > prototype/test patch for this... I already had the datasheet open, so... here it is (in slightly crude form). https://github.com/urjaman/flashrom/commit/b51f09e5f21bf14d492c7d006e0bdd86… there's the commit if somebody wants to just web see. To test, in the flashrom-serprog git tree you have: git pull git checkout mx25l6445e-debug make ./flashrom ... -- Urja Rannikko

1 0

Re: [flashrom] MX25L6445E erase and write failed!
by Urja Rannikko 04 Mar '15

04 Mar '15

Hi, Could you please keep this in the mailing list... On Wed, Mar 4, 2015 at 9:09 AM, The Raven <originalraven(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > Hi Again > > After a long time flashrom trys other erase options. > Have a look here: > -0x0f5fff:E, 0x0f6000-0x0f6fff:E, 0x0f7000-0x0f7fff:E, > 0x0f8000-0x0f8fff:E, 0x0f9000-0x0f9fff:E, 0x0fa000-0x0fafff:E, > 0x0fb000-0x0fbfff:E, 0x0fc000-0x0fcfff:E, 0x0fd000-0x0fdfff:E, > 0x0fe000-0x0fefff:E, 0x0ff000-0x0fffff:E, 0x100000-0x100fff:EFAILED at > 0x00100000! Expected=0xff, Found=0xeb, failed byte count from > 0x00100000-0x00100fff: 0xfe5 > ERASE FAILED! > Reading current flash chip contents... done. Looking for another erase > function. > Trying erase function 1... 0x000000-0x007fff:S, 0x008000-0x00ffff:S, > 0x010000-0x017fff:S, 0x018000-0x01ffff:S, 0x020000-0x027fff:S, > 0x028000-0x02ffff:S, 0x030000-0x037fff:S, 0x038000-0x03ffff:S, > 0x040000-0x047fff:S, 0x048000-0x04ffff:S, 0x050000-0x057fff:S, > 0x058000-0x05ffff:S, 0x060000-0x067fff:S, 0x068000-0x06ffff:S, > 0x070000-0x077fff:S, 0x078000-0x07ffff:S, 0x080000-0x087fff:S, > 0x088000-0x08ffff:S, 0x090000-0x097fff:S, 0x098000-0x09ffff:S, > 0x0a0000-0x0a7fff:S, 0x0a8000-0x0affff:S, 0x0b0000-0x0b7fff:S, > 0x0b8000-0x0bffff:S, 0x0c0000-0x0c7fff:S, 0x0c8000-0x0cffff:S, > 0x0d0000-0x0d7fff:S, 0x0d8000-0x0dffff:S, 0x0e0000-0x0e7fff:S, > 0x0e8000-0x0effff:S, 0x0f0000-0x0f7fff:S, 0x0f8000-0x0fffff:S, > 0x100000-0x107fff:EFAILED at 0x00100000! Expected=0xff, Found=0xeb, > failed byte count from 0x00100000-0x00107fff: 0x7f69 > ERASE FAILED! > Reading current flash chip contents... done. Looking for another erase > function. > Trying erase function 2... 0x000000-0x00ffff:S, 0x010000-0x01ffff:S, > 0x020000-0x02ffff:S, 0x030000-0x03ffff:S, 0x040000-0x04ffff:S, > 0x050000-0x05ffff:S, 0x060000-0x06ffff:S, 0x070000-0x07ffff:S, > 0x080000-0x08ffff:S, 0x090000-0x09ffff:S, 0x0a0000-0x0affff:S, > 0x0b0000-0x0bffff:S, 0x0c0000-0x0cffff:S, 0x0d0000-0x0dffff:S, > 0x0e0000-0x0effff:S, 0x0f0000-0x0fffff:S, 0x100000-0x10ffff:EFAILED at > 0x00100000! Expected=0xff, Found=0xeb, failed byte count from > 0x00100000-0x0010ffff: 0xfb20 > ERASE FAILED! > Reading current flash chip contents... done. Looking for another erase > function. > Trying erase function 3... 0x000000-0x7fffff:EFAILED at 0x00100000! > Expected=0xff, Found=0xeb, failed byte count from 0x00000000-0x007fffff: > 0x26be30 > ERASE FAILED! > Reading current flash chip contents... done. Looking for another erase > function. > Trying erase function 4... 0x000000-0x7fffff:EFAILED at 0x00100000! > Expected=0xff, Found=0xeb, failed byte count from 0x00000000-0x007fffff: > 0x26be30 > ERASE FAILED! > Looking for another erase function. > No usable erase functions left. > FAILED! > > As you can see it always fails at the same byte count. I am still not > sure if this problem is related to serprog. > > Greetings I've an idea. Maybe you've managed to switch the MX25L6445E into the "individual block protection mode" (read the datasheet page 30 - its an OTP, once done once its for good) and now it isnt actually erasing/writing anything at all (that 1M just happens to have succeeded previously) because flashrom currently doesnt know of the invidividual block unlock commands (or even the GBULK gang block unlock) and thinks everything is ok because the status register looks like unlocked. So maybe read the current contents into a file and modify a little bit in the erased area (eg. swap out the first 4k to random data*) and see if it writes. My theory is it wont. *here's example commands: flashrom <insert your parameters> -r current.bin dd if=/dev/urandom of=4krandom.bin bs=1024 count=4 dd if=current.bin bs=1024 skip=4 of=current-4.bin cat 4krandom.bin current-4.bin > modified.bin flashrom <parameters> -w modified.bin Somebody'd need to write a patch to flashrom to use the RDSCUR command to see if WPSEL is set to see for sure. But support for this wouldnt hurt anyways. I'll see if i have time later in the evening to make a prototype/test patch for this... -- Urja Rannikko

1 0

W836xx: FUJITSU D3222-B1: flashrom -V
by crow 03 Mar '15

03 Mar '15

$ sudo flashrom -V -p internal flashrom v0.9.7-r1711 on Linux 3.18.6-1-ARCH (x86_64) flashrom is free software, get the source code at http://www.flashrom.org flashrom was built with libpci 3.2.0, GCC 4.8.2, little endian Command line (3 args): flashrom -V -p internal Calibrating delay loop... OS timer resolution is 1 usecs, 3691M loops per second, 10 myus = 10 us, 100 myus = 103 us, 1000 myus = 1007 us, 10000 myus = 10010 us, 4 myus = 4 us, OK. Initializing internal programmer No coreboot table found. DMI string system-manufacturer: "FUJITSU" DMI string system-product-name: "D3222-B1" DMI string system-version: " " DMI string baseboard-manufacturer: "FUJITSU" DMI string baseboard-product-name: "D3222-B1" DMI string baseboard-version: "S26361-D3222-B1 " DMI string chassis-type: "Mini Tower" W836xx enter config mode worked or we were already in config mode. W836xx leave config mode had no effect. Active config mode, unknown reg 0x20 ID: 00. Please send the output of "flashrom -V" to flashrom(a)flashrom.org with W836xx: your board name: flashrom -V as the subject to help us finish support for your Super I/O. Thanks. Found chipset "Intel Q87" with PCI ID 8086:8c4e. This chipset is marked as untested. If you are using an up-to-date version of flashrom *and* were (not) able to successfully update your firmware with it, then please email a report to flashrom(a)flashrom.org including a verbose (-V) log. Thank you! Enabling flash write... 0xfff80000/0xffb80000 FWH IDSEL: 0x0 0xfff00000/0xffb00000 FWH IDSEL: 0x0 0xffe80000/0xffa80000 FWH IDSEL: 0x1 0xffe00000/0xffa00000 FWH IDSEL: 0x1 0xffd80000/0xff980000 FWH IDSEL: 0x2 0xffd00000/0xff900000 FWH IDSEL: 0x2 0xffc80000/0xff880000 FWH IDSEL: 0x3 0xffc00000/0xff800000 FWH IDSEL: 0x3 0xff700000/0xff300000 FWH IDSEL: 0x4 0xff600000/0xff200000 FWH IDSEL: 0x5 0xff500000/0xff100000 FWH IDSEL: 0x6 0xff400000/0xff000000 FWH IDSEL: 0x7 0xfff80000/0xffb80000 FWH decode enabled 0xfff00000/0xffb00000 FWH decode enabled 0xffe80000/0xffa80000 FWH decode enabled 0xffe00000/0xffa00000 FWH decode enabled 0xffd80000/0xff980000 FWH decode enabled 0xffd00000/0xff900000 FWH decode enabled 0xffc80000/0xff880000 FWH decode enabled 0xffc00000/0xff800000 FWH decode enabled 0xff700000/0xff300000 FWH decode enabled 0xff600000/0xff200000 FWH decode enabled 0xff500000/0xff100000 FWH decode enabled 0xff400000/0xff000000 FWH decode enabled Maximum FWH chip size: 0x100000 bytes BIOS_CNTL = 0x2a: BIOS Lock Enable: enabled, BIOS Write Enable: disabled Warning: BIOS region SMM protection is enabled! Warning: Setting Bios Control at 0xdc from 0x2a to 0x0b on Q87 failed. New value is 0x2a. Root Complex Register Block address = 0xfed1c000 GCS = 0xc61: BIOS Interface Lock-Down: enabled, Boot BIOS Straps: 0x3 (SPI) Top Swap : not enabled SPIBAR = 0xfed1c000 + 0x3800 0x04: 0xf008 (HSFS) HSFS: FDONE=0, FCERR=0, AEL=0, BERASE=1, SCIP=0, FDOPSS=1, FDV=1, FLOCKDN=1 Warning: SPI Configuration Lockdown activated. Reading OPCODES... done 0x06: 0x3f00 (HSFC) HSFC: FGO=0, FCYCLE=0, FDBC=63, SME=0 0x50: 0x00004a4b (FRAP) BMWAG 0x00, BMRAG 0x00, BRWA 0x4a, BRRA 0x4b 0x54: 0x00000000 FREG0: Warning: Flash Descriptor region (0x00000000-0x00000fff) is read-only. 0x58: 0x07ff0500 FREG1: BIOS region (0x00500000-0x007fffff) is read-write. 0x5C: 0x04ff0003 FREG2: Warning: Management Engine region (0x00003000-0x004fffff) is locked. 0x60: 0x00020001 FREG3: Gigabit Ethernet region (0x00001000-0x00002fff) is read-write. Not all flash regions are freely accessible by flashrom. This is most likely due to an active ME. Please see http://flashrom.org/ME for details. Writes have been disabled for safety reasons. You can enforce write support with the ich_spi_force programmer option, but you will most likely harm your hardware! If you force flashrom you will get no support if something breaks. On a few mainboards it is possible to enable write access by setting a jumper (see its documentation or the board itself). 0x90: 0xc0 (SSFS) SSFS: SCIP=0, FDONE=0, FCERR=0, AEL=0 0x91: 0xfc4010 (SSFC) SSFC: SCGO=0, ACS=0, SPOP=0, COP=1, DBC=0, SME=0, SCF=4 0x94: 0x0006 (PREOP) 0x96: 0x043b (OPTYPE) 0x98: 0x05203b02 (OPMENU) 0x9C: 0x0000019f (OPMENU+4) 0xA0: 0x00000000 (BBAR) 0xC4: 0x80802045 (LVSCC) LVSCC: BES=0x1, WG=1, WSR=0, WEWS=0, EO=0x20, VCL=1 0xC8: 0x00002045 (UVSCC) UVSCC: BES=0x1, WG=1, WSR=0, WEWS=0, EO=0x20, VCL=0 0xD0: 0x50444653 (FPB) Enabling hardware sequencing because some important opcode is locked. SPI Read Configuration: prefetching enabled, caching enabled, PROBLEMS, continuing anyway The following protocols are supported: FWH, Programmer-specific. Probing for Programmer Opaque flash chip, 0 kB: Found 1 attached SPI flash chip with a density of 8192 kB. The flash address space (0x000000 - 0x7fffff) is divided at address 0x653000 in two partitions. The first partition ranges from 0x000000 to 0x652fff. In that range are 1619 erase blocks with 4096 B each. The second partition ranges from 0x653000 to 0x7fffff. In that range are 429 erase blocks with 4096 B each. Found Programmer flash chip "Opaque flash chip" (8192 kB, Programmer-specific) at physical address 0x0. Probing for Atmel AT49LH002, 256 kB: probe_82802ab: id1 0x58, id2 0x01, id1 is normal flash content, id2 is normal flash content Probing for Intel 82802AB, 512 kB: probe_82802ab: id1 0x0c, id2 0x00, id1 parity violation, id1 is normal flash content, id2 is normal flash content Probing for Intel 82802AC, 1024 kB: probe_82802ab: id1 0x17, id2 0x0e, id1 parity violation, id1 is normal flash content, id2 is normal flash content Probing for PMC Pm49FL002, 256 kB: probe_jedec_common: id1 0x58, id2 0x01, id1 is normal flash content, id2 is normal flash content Probing for PMC Pm49FL004, 512 kB: probe_jedec_common: id1 0x0c, id2 0x00, id1 parity violation, id1 is normal flash content, id2 is normal flash content Probing for Sharp LHF00L04, 1024 kB: probe_82802ab: id1 0x17, id2 0x0e, id1 parity violation, id1 is normal flash content, id2 is normal flash content Probing for SST SST49LF002A/B, 256 kB: probe_jedec_common: id1 0x58, id2 0x01, id1 is normal flash content, id2 is normal flash content Probing for SST SST49LF003A/B, 384 kB: probe_jedec_common: id1 0x7d, id2 0xf4, id1 parity violation, id1 is normal flash content, id2 is normal flash content Probing for SST SST49LF004A/B, 512 kB: probe_jedec_common: id1 0x0c, id2 0x00, id1 parity violation, id1 is normal flash content, id2 is normal flash content Probing for SST SST49LF004C, 512 kB: probe_82802ab: id1 0x0c, id2 0x00, id1 parity violation, id1 is normal flash content, id2 is normal flash content Probing for SST SST49LF008A, 1024 kB: probe_jedec_common: id1 0x17, id2 0x0e, id1 parity violation, id1 is normal flash content, id2 is normal flash content Probing for SST SST49LF008C, 1024 kB: probe_82802ab: id1 0x17, id2 0x0e, id1 parity violation, id1 is normal flash content, id2 is normal flash content Probing for SST SST49LF016C, 2048 kB: Chip size 2048 kB is bigger than supported size 1024 kB of chipset/board/programmer for FWH interface, probe/read/erase/write may fail. probe_82802ab: id1 0xf7, id2 0x85, id1 is normal flash content, id2 is normal flash content Probing for ST M50FLW040A, 512 kB: probe_82802ab: id1 0x0c, id2 0x00, id1 parity violation, id1 is normal flash content, id2 is normal flash content Probing for ST M50FLW040B, 512 kB: probe_82802ab: id1 0x0c, id2 0x00, id1 parity violation, id1 is normal flash content, id2 is normal flash content Probing for ST M50FLW080A, 1024 kB: probe_82802ab: id1 0x17, id2 0x0e, id1 parity violation, id1 is normal flash content, id2 is normal flash content Probing for ST M50FLW080B, 1024 kB: probe_82802ab: id1 0x17, id2 0x0e, id1 parity violation, id1 is normal flash content, id2 is normal flash content Probing for ST M50FW002, 256 kB: probe_82802ab: id1 0x58, id2 0x01, id1 is normal flash content, id2 is normal flash content Probing for ST M50FW016, 2048 kB: Chip size 2048 kB is bigger than supported size 1024 kB of chipset/board/programmer for FWH interface, probe/read/erase/write may fail. probe_82802ab: id1 0xf7, id2 0x85, id1 is normal flash content, id2 is normal flash content Probing for ST M50FW040, 512 kB: probe_82802ab: id1 0x0c, id2 0x00, id1 parity violation, id1 is normal flash content, id2 is normal flash content Probing for ST M50FW080, 1024 kB: probe_82802ab: id1 0x17, id2 0x0e, id1 parity violation, id1 is normal flash content, id2 is normal flash content Probing for Winbond W39V040FA, 512 kB: probe_jedec_common: id1 0x0c, id2 0x00, id1 parity violation, id1 is normal flash content, id2 is normal flash content Probing for Winbond W39V040FB, 512 kB: probe_jedec_common: id1 0x0c, id2 0x00, id1 parity violation, id1 is normal flash content, id2 is normal flash content Probing for Winbond W39V040FC, 512 kB: probe_jedec_common: id1 0x0c, id2 0x00, id1 parity violation, id1 is normal flash content, id2 is normal flash content Probing for Winbond W49V002FA, 256 kB: probe_jedec_common: id1 0x58, id2 0x01, id1 is normal flash content, id2 is normal flash content Probing for Winbond W39V080FA, 1024 kB: probe_jedec_common: id1 0x17, id2 0x0e, id1 parity violation, id1 is normal flash content, id2 is normal flash content Probing for Winbond W39V080FA (dual mode), 512 kB: probe_jedec_common: id1 0x0c, id2 0x00, id1 parity violation, id1 is normal flash content, id2 is normal flash content Found Programmer flash chip "Opaque flash chip" (8192 kB, Programmer-specific). No operations were specified. Restoring MMIO space at 0x7f9f728468a0 Restoring PCI config space for 00:1f:0 reg 0xdc $

1 0

Re: [flashrom] [coreboot] New flashrom logo - please vote!
by Stefan Tauner 03 Mar '15

03 Mar '15

On Mon, 2 Mar 2015 09:03:59 -0800 Vadim Bendebury <vbendeb(a)chromium.org> wrote: > Not that I care much, but I can't help it: this new symbol looks very > much like the infamous SS Bolts: > http://www.adl.org/combating-hate/hate-on-display/c/ss-bolts.html#.VPSXeFX3… Yes, it could be mistaken for a sig rune although it clearly differs (the rune is not formed as an arrow on the bottom but is symmetric). I would not use two of this or similar symbols side by side because it could easily be seen as a political statement I definitely don't want to make. But on the other hand there are a lot of other (admittedly less known) runes and symbols used by the SS or other Nazi organizations that we use on a daily basis probably without even knowing it... (e.g. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Runic_insignia_of_the_Schutzstaffel#mediaview…) So thanks for bringing this up - it is a valid concern - but I draw the line not to cross elsewhere. -- Kind regards/Mit freundlichen Grüßen, Stefan Tauner

3 2

Re: [flashrom] MX25L6445E erase and write failed!
by Urja Rannikko 03 Mar '15

03 Mar '15

Hi, Just "forwarding" (really replying) this to the mailing list so others can see too. I see no serprog errors this time, so now it starts to feel like maybe some kind of flashrom problem (4k erase doesnt work after that addr? why?), but not sure. I'll take a look at the definitions and datasheet etc later, now at work. On Tue, Mar 3, 2015 at 10:52 AM, The Raven <originalraven(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > Okidoki Dr. Johnes ;-) > > Have tested the "MX25L6445E" with normal flashrom and frser-duino -> > Same error as before! > > Then i have compiled and used your special flashrom version (no compiler > errors) with frser-duino -> Also same error! :-( > > Here is the whole log: > > raven@PC ~/flashrom-master $ ./flashrom -p > serprog:dev=/dev/ttyACM0:115200 -c > "MX25L6436E/MX25L6445E/MX25L6465E/MX25L6473E" -VE > flashrom v0.9.8-unknown on Linux 3.13.0-24-generic (i686) > flashrom is free software, get the source code at http://www.flashrom.org > > flashrom was built with libpci 3.2.1, GCC 4.8.2, little endian > Command line (5 args): ./flashrom -p serprog:dev=/dev/ttyACM0:115200 -c > MX25L6436E/MX25L6445E/MX25L6465E/MX25L6473E -VE > Calibrating delay loop... OS timer resolution is 1 usecs, 1083M loops > per second, 10 myus = 10 us, 100 myus = 143 us, 1000 myus = 963 us, > 10000 myus = 10405 us, 4 myus = 5 us, OK. > Initializing serprog programmer > Baud rate is 115200 now. > serprog: connected - attempting to synchronize > ... > serprog: Synchronized > serprog: Interface version ok. > serprog: Bus support: parallel=off, LPC=off, FWH=off, SPI=on > serprog: Maximum write-n length is 256 > serprog: Maximum read-n length is 23552 > serprog: Programmer name is "frser-duino" > serprog: Serial buffer size is 1020 > serprog: operation buffer size is 12 > serprog: Output drivers enabled > The following protocols are supported: SPI. > Probing for Macronix MX25L6436E/MX25L6445E/MX25L6465E/MX25L6473E, 8192 > kB: probe_spi_rdid_generic: id1 0xc2, id2 0x2017 > Found Macronix flash chip "MX25L6436E/MX25L6445E/MX25L6465E/MX25L6473E" > (8192 kB, SPI) on serprog. > Chip status register is 0x00. > Chip status register: Status Register Write Disable (SRWD, SRP, ...) is > not set > Chip status register: Bit 6 is not set > Chip status register: Block Protect 3 (BP3) is not set > Chip status register: Block Protect 2 (BP2) is not set > Chip status register: Block Protect 1 (BP1) is not set > Chip status register: Block Protect 0 (BP0) is not set > Chip status register: Write Enable Latch (WEL) is not set > Chip status register: Write In Progress (WIP/BUSY) is not set > This chip may contain one-time programmable memory. flashrom cannot read > and may never be able to write it, hence it may not be able to completely > clone the contents of this chip (see man page for details). > Erasing and writing flash chip... Trying erase function 0... > 0x000000-0x000fff:E, 0x001000-0x001fff:E, 0x002000-0x002fff:E, > 0x003000-0x003fff:E, 0x004000-0x004fff:E, 0x005000-0x005fff:E, > 0x006000-0x006fff:E, 0x007000-0x007fff:E, 0x008000-0x008fff:E, > 0x009000-0x009fff:E, 0x00a000-0x00afff:E, 0x00b000-0x00bfff:E, > 0x00c000-0x00cfff:E, 0x00d000-0x00dfff:E, 0x00e000-0x00efff:E, > 0x00f000-0x00ffff:E, 0x010000-0x010fff:E, 0x011000-0x011fff:E, > 0x012000-0x012fff:E, 0x013000-0x013fff:E, 0x014000-0x014fff:E, > 0x015000-0x015fff:E, 0x016000-0x016fff:E, 0x017000-0x017fff:E, > 0x018000-0x018fff:E, 0x019000-0x019fff:E, 0x01a000-0x01afff:E, > 0x01b000-0x01bfff:E, 0x01c000-0x01cfff:E, 0x01d000-0x01dfff:E, > 0x01e000-0x01efff:E, 0x01f000-0x01ffff:E, 0x020000-0x020fff:E, > 0x021000-0x021fff:E, 0x022000-0x022fff:E, 0x023000-0x023fff:E, > 0x024000-0x024fff:E, 0x025000-0x025fff:E, 0x026000-0x026fff:E, > 0x027000-0x027fff:E, 0x028000-0x028fff:E, 0x029000-0x029fff:E, > 0x02a000-0x02afff:E, 0x02b000-0x02bfff:E, 0x02c000-0x02cfff:E, > 0x02d000-0x02dfff:E, 0x02e000-0x02efff:E, 0x02f000-0x02ffff:E, > 0x030000-0x030fff:E, 0x031000-0x031fff:E, 0x032000-0x032fff:E, > 0x033000-0x033fff:E, 0x034000-0x034fff:E, 0x035000-0x035fff:E, > 0x036000-0x036fff:E, 0x037000-0x037fff:E, 0x038000-0x038fff:E, > 0x039000-0x039fff:E, 0x03a000-0x03afff:E, 0x03b000-0x03bfff:E, > 0x03c000-0x03cfff:E, 0x03d000-0x03dfff:E, 0x03e000-0x03efff:E, > 0x03f000-0x03ffff:E, 0x040000-0x040fff:E, 0x041000-0x041fff:E, > 0x042000-0x042fff:E, 0x043000-0x043fff:E, 0x044000-0x044fff:E, > 0x045000-0x045fff:E, 0x046000-0x046fff:E, 0x047000-0x047fff:E, > 0x048000-0x048fff:E, 0x049000-0x049fff:E, 0x04a000-0x04afff:E, > 0x04b000-0x04bfff:E, 0x04c000-0x04cfff:E, 0x04d000-0x04dfff:E, > 0x04e000-0x04efff:E, 0x04f000-0x04ffff:E, 0x050000-0x050fff:E, > 0x051000-0x051fff:E, 0x052000-0x052fff:E, 0x053000-0x053fff:E, > 0x054000-0x054fff:E, 0x055000-0x055fff:E, 0x056000-0x056fff:E, > 0x057000-0x057fff:E, 0x058000-0x058fff:E, 0x059000-0x059fff:E, > 0x05a000-0x05afff:E, 0x05b000-0x05bfff:E, 0x05c000-0x05cfff:E, > 0x05d000-0x05dfff:E, 0x05e000-0x05efff:E, 0x05f000-0x05ffff:E, > 0x060000-0x060fff:E, 0x061000-0x061fff:E, 0x062000-0x062fff:E, > 0x063000-0x063fff:E, 0x064000-0x064fff:E, 0x065000-0x065fff:E, > 0x066000-0x066fff:E, 0x067000-0x067fff:E, 0x068000-0x068fff:E, > 0x069000-0x069fff:E, 0x06a000-0x06afff:E, 0x06b000-0x06bfff:E, > 0x06c000-0x06cfff:E, 0x06d000-0x06dfff:E, 0x06e000-0x06efff:E, > 0x06f000-0x06ffff:E, 0x070000-0x070fff:E, 0x071000-0x071fff:E, > 0x072000-0x072fff:E, 0x073000-0x073fff:E, 0x074000-0x074fff:E, > 0x075000-0x075fff:E, 0x076000-0x076fff:E, 0x077000-0x077fff:E, > 0x078000-0x078fff:E, 0x079000-0x079fff:E, 0x07a000-0x07afff:E, > 0x07b000-0x07bfff:E, 0x07c000-0x07cfff:E, 0x07d000-0x07dfff:E, > 0x07e000-0x07efff:E, 0x07f000-0x07ffff:E, 0x080000-0x080fff:E, > 0x081000-0x081fff:E, 0x082000-0x082fff:E, 0x083000-0x083fff:E, > 0x084000-0x084fff:E, 0x085000-0x085fff:E, 0x086000-0x086fff:E, > 0x087000-0x087fff:E, 0x088000-0x088fff:E, 0x089000-0x089fff:E, > 0x08a000-0x08afff:E, 0x08b000-0x08bfff:E, 0x08c000-0x08cfff:E, > 0x08d000-0x08dfff:E, 0x08e000-0x08efff:E, 0x08f000-0x08ffff:E, > 0x090000-0x090fff:E, 0x091000-0x091fff:E, 0x092000-0x092fff:E, > 0x093000-0x093fff:E, 0x094000-0x094fff:E, 0x095000-0x095fff:E, > 0x096000-0x096fff:E, 0x097000-0x097fff:E, 0x098000-0x098fff:E, > 0x099000-0x099fff:E, 0x09a000-0x09afff:E, 0x09b000-0x09bfff:E, > 0x09c000-0x09cfff:E, 0x09d000-0x09dfff:E, 0x09e000-0x09efff:E, > 0x09f000-0x09ffff:E, 0x0a0000-0x0a0fff:E, 0x0a1000-0x0a1fff:E, > 0x0a2000-0x0a2fff:E, 0x0a3000-0x0a3fff:E, 0x0a4000-0x0a4fff:E, > 0x0a5000-0x0a5fff:E, 0x0a6000-0x0a6fff:E, 0x0a7000-0x0a7fff:E, > 0x0a8000-0x0a8fff:E, 0x0a9000-0x0a9fff:E, 0x0aa000-0x0aafff:E, > 0x0ab000-0x0abfff:E, 0x0ac000-0x0acfff:E, 0x0ad000-0x0adfff:E, > 0x0ae000-0x0aefff:E, 0x0af000-0x0affff:E, 0x0b0000-0x0b0fff:E, > 0x0b1000-0x0b1fff:E, 0x0b2000-0x0b2fff:E, 0x0b3000-0x0b3fff:E, > 0x0b4000-0x0b4fff:E, 0x0b5000-0x0b5fff:E, 0x0b6000-0x0b6fff:E, > 0x0b7000-0x0b7fff:E, 0x0b8000-0x0b8fff:E, 0x0b9000-0x0b9fff:E, > 0x0ba000-0x0bafff:E, 0x0bb000-0x0bbfff:E, 0x0bc000-0x0bcfff:E, > 0x0bd000-0x0bdfff:E, 0x0be000-0x0befff:E, 0x0bf000-0x0bffff:E, > 0x0c0000-0x0c0fff:E, 0x0c1000-0x0c1fff:E, 0x0c2000-0x0c2fff:E, > 0x0c3000-0x0c3fff:E, 0x0c4000-0x0c4fff:E, 0x0c5000-0x0c5fff:E, > 0x0c6000-0x0c6fff:E, 0x0c7000-0x0c7fff:E, 0x0c8000-0x0c8fff:E, > 0x0c9000-0x0c9fff:E, 0x0ca000-0x0cafff:E, 0x0cb000-0x0cbfff:E, > 0x0cc000-0x0ccfff:E, 0x0cd000-0x0cdfff:E, 0x0ce000-0x0cefff:E, > 0x0cf000-0x0cffff:E, 0x0d0000-0x0d0fff:E, 0x0d1000-0x0d1fff:E, > 0x0d2000-0x0d2fff:E, 0x0d3000-0x0d3fff:E, 0x0d4000-0x0d4fff:E, > 0x0d5000-0x0d5fff:E, 0x0d6000-0x0d6fff:E, 0x0d7000-0x0d7fff:E, > 0x0d8000-0x0d8fff:E, 0x0d9000-0x0d9fff:E, 0x0da000-0x0dafff:E, > 0x0db000-0x0dbfff:E, 0x0dc000-0x0dcfff:E, 0x0dd000-0x0ddfff:E, > 0x0de000-0x0defff:E, 0x0df000-0x0dffff:E, 0x0e0000-0x0e0fff:E, > 0x0e1000-0x0e1fff:E, 0x0e2000-0x0e2fff:E, 0x0e3000-0x0e3fff:E, > 0x0e4000-0x0e4fff:E, 0x0e5000-0x0e5fff:E, 0x0e6000-0x0e6fff:E, > 0x0e7000-0x0e7fff:E, 0x0e8000-0x0e8fff:E, 0x0e9000-0x0e9fff:E, > 0x0ea000-0x0eafff:E, 0x0eb000-0x0ebfff:E, 0x0ec000-0x0ecfff:E, > 0x0ed000-0x0edfff:E, 0x0ee000-0x0eefff:E, 0x0ef000-0x0effff:E, > 0x0f0000-0x0f0fff:E, 0x0f1000-0x0f1fff:E, 0x0f2000-0x0f2fff:E, > 0x0f3000-0x0f3fff:E, 0x0f4000-0x0f4fff:E, 0x0f5000-0x0f5fff:E, > 0x0f6000-0x0f6fff:E, 0x0f7000-0x0f7fff:E, 0x0f8000-0x0f8fff:E, > 0x0f9000-0x0f9fff:E, 0x0fa000-0x0fafff:E, 0x0fb000-0x0fbfff:E, > 0x0fc000-0x0fcfff:E, 0x0fd000-0x0fdfff:E, 0x0fe000-0x0fefff:E, > 0x0ff000-0x0fffff:E, 0x100000-0x100fff:EFAILED at 0x00100000! > Expected=0xff, Found=0xeb, failed byte count from 0x00100000-0x00100fff: > 0xfe5 > ERASE FAILED! > Reading current flash chip contents... > > Again same address "0x00100000". > What can i do or what should i test? Any idea? Maybe more "V" for verbose? > Now i try to write random data, but i guess it does also not work. But i > give it a try. > > Greetings > > Am 02.03.2015 um 23:51 schrieb Urja Rannikko: >> Hi, >> >> I'm also addressing the mailing list now, because i think the last bit >> is interesting to more people. >> >> On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 11:48 PM, The Raven <originalraven(a)hotmail.com> wrote: >>> Hi again >>>> I'd like to know how the "U2" firmware fails, and this flashrom might >>>> be better at breaking it and telling what happened: >>>> This is how to use that my flashrom branch: >>>> git clone git://github.com/urjaman/flashrom flashrom-serprog >>>> cd flashrom-serprog >>>> git checkout serprog-improvements >>>> make >>>> ./flashrom .... <same parameters here as you used before ...> >>>> >>>> And report me what happened... then, there's a second thing i just made. >>> Does not compile! >>> I got this: >>> serprog.c: In function ‘serprog_map’: >>> serprog.c:1128:3: error: format ‘%d’ expects argument of type ‘int’, but >>> argument 5 has type ‘size_t’ [-Werror=format=] >>> msg_pwarn(MSGHEADER "incompatible mapping '%s' phys_addr 0x%08X len >>> %d, returning NULL\n", >>> ^ >>> cc1: all warnings being treated as errors >>> make: *** [serprog.o] Fehler 1 >>> >>> Can you tell me whats wrong? Tomorrow i try it again. >> Sorry, my compiler was too old and it didnt produce this warning thus >> i didnt notice it. >> I think fixed it in my branch, so you can >> git pull >> make >> to try again with the fix. >> If there are other warnings that get in the way, you can >> disable -Werror with >> make WARNERROR=no >> >> and send me all the warnings it produced so i can fix them all. >> Thanks a lot for reporting this :) >> >>>> I got a bit carried away reading the serprog-duino firmware code >>>> and decided to just see what it'd look like with my frser-* codebase. >>>> So, fresh out of the oven, and untested (i tested on my m644p before i >>>> converted it for the m328p): >>>> https://github.com/urjaman/frser-duino >>>> To use it: >>>> git clone git://github.com/urjaman/frser-duino >>>> cd frser-duino >>>> make && make program >>>> >>>> (the defaults are for the u2 arduino, eg. ttyACM0 and 115200, i didnt >>>> have time to work the makefile magic that hard.) >>>> >>>> With luck it might work, but I'm expecting failure. Report where it failed. >>>> If its something simple you can fix it too if you want to, just commit >>>> it and send me the git format-patch -1 :) >>>> If it compiled and programmed, then try the flashrom-serprog again >>>> And if that works try the stock flashrom too. >>> Have tried this with the "normal" flashrom and it seems to work with the >>> "M25P10-A"!!! >>> >>> Look the "short" log: >>> Found Micron/Numonyx/ST flash chip "M25P10-A" (128 kB, SPI). >>> === >>> This flash part has status UNTESTED for operations: WRITE >>> The test status of this chip may have been updated in the latest development >>> version of flashrom. If you are running the latest development version, >>> please email a report to flashrom(a)flashrom.org if any of the above >>> operations >>> work correctly for you with this flash chip. Please include the flashrom log >>> file for all operations you tested (see the man page for details), and >>> mention >>> which mainboard or programmer you tested in the subject line. >>> Thanks for your help! >>> Erasing and writing flash chip... Trying erase function 0... >>> 0x000000-0x007fff:E, 0x008000-0x00ffff:E, 0x010000-0x017fff:E, >>> 0x018000-0x01ffff:E >>> Erase/write done. >>> serprog: Output drivers disabled >>> >>> Done! This was never possible with the "other" serprog code! >>> >>> And writing of random data: >>> Found Micron/Numonyx/ST flash chip "M25P10-A" (128 kB, SPI). >>> === >>> This flash part has status UNTESTED for operations: WRITE >>> The test status of this chip may have been updated in the latest development >>> version of flashrom. If you are running the latest development version, >>> please email a report to flashrom(a)flashrom.org if any of the above >>> operations >>> work correctly for you with this flash chip. Please include the flashrom log >>> file for all operations you tested (see the man page for details), and >>> mention >>> which mainboard or programmer you tested in the subject line. >>> Thanks for your help! >>> Reading old flash chip contents... done. >>> Erasing and writing flash chip... Trying erase function 0... >>> 0x000000-0x007fff:W, 0x008000-0x00ffff:W, 0x010000-0x017fff:W, >>> 0x018000-0x01ffff:W >>> Erase/write done. >>> Verifying flash... VERIFIED. >>> serprog: Output drivers disabled >>> >>> Also done! I think this looks really good! :-) >>> Tomorrow i try the MX25L6445E, let's see what happens! >>> >>> THX for your help and making things better! :-) >>> >> I sent this to the mailing list too because that seems like a report >> for M25P10-A write tested ok :) >> >> > -- Urja Rannikko

1 0

Re: [flashrom] PLCC chip flashing via Raspberry GPIO
by Stefan Tauner 03 Mar '15

03 Mar '15

On Tue, 3 Mar 2015 03:07:09 +0700 Darmawan Salihun <darmawan.salihun(a)gmail.com> wrote: > Is it now possible to flash PLCC chip with Raspberry Pi? > > AFAIK, SPI chips are already supported but I have a PLCC flash chip > right now to work with (Winbond W39V040FC). PLCC (the physical package) support different protocols, cf. http://flashrom.org/Technology#Communication_bus_protocol The W39V040FC is a FWH chip and thus could in theory be accessed with a RaspberryPi - it has enough GPIO ports. I am not sure if they can be toggled fast enough, but I'd guess so. The problem is rather to write the respective software/driver - AFAIK there is none yet. It would definitely be easier to get a similar board and try hotswapping the flash chip. -- Kind regards/Mit freundlichen Grüßen, Stefan Tauner

2 1

Re: [flashrom] Trouble disabling write-protection on Chromebook
by JC C 03 Mar '15

03 Mar '15

Skickat från min iPhone

1 0

Re: [flashrom] MX25L6445E erase and write failed!
by Urja Rannikko 03 Mar '15

03 Mar '15

Hi, I'm also addressing the mailing list now, because i think the last bit is interesting to more people. On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 11:48 PM, The Raven <originalraven(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > Hi again >> I'd like to know how the "U2" firmware fails, and this flashrom might >> be better at breaking it and telling what happened: >> This is how to use that my flashrom branch: >> git clone git://github.com/urjaman/flashrom flashrom-serprog >> cd flashrom-serprog >> git checkout serprog-improvements >> make >> ./flashrom .... <same parameters here as you used before ...> >> >> And report me what happened... then, there's a second thing i just made. > Does not compile! > I got this: > serprog.c: In function ‘serprog_map’: > serprog.c:1128:3: error: format ‘%d’ expects argument of type ‘int’, but > argument 5 has type ‘size_t’ [-Werror=format=] > msg_pwarn(MSGHEADER "incompatible mapping '%s' phys_addr 0x%08X len > %d, returning NULL\n", > ^ > cc1: all warnings being treated as errors > make: *** [serprog.o] Fehler 1 > > Can you tell me whats wrong? Tomorrow i try it again. Sorry, my compiler was too old and it didnt produce this warning thus i didnt notice it. I think fixed it in my branch, so you can git pull make to try again with the fix. If there are other warnings that get in the way, you can disable -Werror with make WARNERROR=no and send me all the warnings it produced so i can fix them all. Thanks a lot for reporting this :) > >> I got a bit carried away reading the serprog-duino firmware code >> and decided to just see what it'd look like with my frser-* codebase. >> So, fresh out of the oven, and untested (i tested on my m644p before i >> converted it for the m328p): >> https://github.com/urjaman/frser-duino >> To use it: >> git clone git://github.com/urjaman/frser-duino >> cd frser-duino >> make && make program >> >> (the defaults are for the u2 arduino, eg. ttyACM0 and 115200, i didnt >> have time to work the makefile magic that hard.) >> >> With luck it might work, but I'm expecting failure. Report where it failed. >> If its something simple you can fix it too if you want to, just commit >> it and send me the git format-patch -1 :) >> If it compiled and programmed, then try the flashrom-serprog again >> And if that works try the stock flashrom too. > Have tried this with the "normal" flashrom and it seems to work with the > "M25P10-A"!!! > > Look the "short" log: > Found Micron/Numonyx/ST flash chip "M25P10-A" (128 kB, SPI). > === > This flash part has status UNTESTED for operations: WRITE > The test status of this chip may have been updated in the latest development > version of flashrom. If you are running the latest development version, > please email a report to flashrom(a)flashrom.org if any of the above > operations > work correctly for you with this flash chip. Please include the flashrom log > file for all operations you tested (see the man page for details), and > mention > which mainboard or programmer you tested in the subject line. > Thanks for your help! > Erasing and writing flash chip... Trying erase function 0... > 0x000000-0x007fff:E, 0x008000-0x00ffff:E, 0x010000-0x017fff:E, > 0x018000-0x01ffff:E > Erase/write done. > serprog: Output drivers disabled > > Done! This was never possible with the "other" serprog code! > > And writing of random data: > Found Micron/Numonyx/ST flash chip "M25P10-A" (128 kB, SPI). > === > This flash part has status UNTESTED for operations: WRITE > The test status of this chip may have been updated in the latest development > version of flashrom. If you are running the latest development version, > please email a report to flashrom(a)flashrom.org if any of the above > operations > work correctly for you with this flash chip. Please include the flashrom log > file for all operations you tested (see the man page for details), and > mention > which mainboard or programmer you tested in the subject line. > Thanks for your help! > Reading old flash chip contents... done. > Erasing and writing flash chip... Trying erase function 0... > 0x000000-0x007fff:W, 0x008000-0x00ffff:W, 0x010000-0x017fff:W, > 0x018000-0x01ffff:W > Erase/write done. > Verifying flash... VERIFIED. > serprog: Output drivers disabled > > Also done! I think this looks really good! :-) > Tomorrow i try the MX25L6445E, let's see what happens! > > THX for your help and making things better! :-) > I sent this to the mailing list too because that seems like a report for M25P10-A write tested ok :) -- Urja Rannikko

1 0

PLCC chip flashing via Raspberry GPIO
by Darmawan Salihun 02 Mar '15

02 Mar '15

Is it now possible to flash PLCC chip with Raspberry Pi? AFAIK, SPI chips are already supported but I have a PLCC flash chip right now to work with (Winbond W39V040FC). Kind Regards, Darmawan -------------------------------------------------------------------- -= Знания людей принадлежат миру =- [-Human knowledge belongs to the world-]

1 0

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

flashrom