- flashrom - mail.coreboot.org

W25X80: ASUS P5K SE sucessfully reflashed
by Александр Трубицын 24 Dec '15

24 Dec '15

Hi! -- With best regards, Alexander V. Trubitsyn

2 1

W25Q64.V: flashrom can't read flash on ASUS P8H77-V LE
by Александр Трубицын 24 Dec '15

24 Dec '15

Hi! -- With best regards, Alexander V. Trubitsyn

2 1

Re: [flashrom] Problems flashing N25Q064A13ESE40E SPI chip
by Stefan Tauner 24 Dec '15

24 Dec '15

On Fri, 11 Dec 2015 10:52:38 +0100 Ruben Van de Put <rubenvandeput(a)gmail.com> wrote: > Hello, > > I'm having some problems flashing a SPI chip with the BusPirate V3. Writing > the image is successful but verification is not successful. > > First try with chip on breadboard and long leads (20-25cm): > http://paste.flashrom.org/view.php?id=2841 > > Then I shortened the signal leads and soldered them directly on the > BusPirate: > http://paste.flashrom.org/view.php?id=2842 > > Then I soldered all leads directly on the chip (with an adapter) instead of > using a breadboard: > http://paste.flashrom.org/view.php?id=2844 > > I also tried lowering the SPI speed to 1 MHz: > http://paste.flashrom.org/view.php?id=2845 > > Current set-up > [image: Inline afbeelding 1] > [image: Inline afbeelding 2] > > Chip datasheet: http://www.farnell.com/datasheets/1674442.pdf > Flash connected in this way: http://flashrom.org/Bus_Pirate > > Is there anything else I can try or should I try replacing the flash chip? Hi Ruben, if you did not give up yet: looks like your changes constantly improved the situation and you would probably succeed if you just continued to write the same image a few more times. One thing that could further improve the communication between the BP and the flash chip: adding line termination resistors or capacitors as well as a decoupling capacitor between VCC and GND as near as possible to the flash chip. See also https://www.flashrom.org/ISP with some more details even though the site is directed at other use cases. -- Kind regards/Mit freundlichen Grüßen, Stefan Tauner

1 0

Re: [flashrom] FAILED: Lenovo X1 (2015)
by Rui Paulo 24 Dec '15

24 Dec '15

On Thu, 2015-12-17 at 13:08 +0300, Антон Кочков wrote: > Hello! > Mainstream flashrom currently not yet merged patches, adding support > of reading layout. Because ME region usually not readable not from ME > itself, > it should be skipped, so using layout file, in your case: > # flashrom layout v2 > 0x00000000:0x00000fff descr > 0x00500000:0x00ffffff BIOS > 0x00003000:0x004fffff ME > 0x00001000:0x00002fff GbE > > And using flashrom with my patches should help: > https://github.com/XVilka/flashrom/tree/layout_descriptor > > Some of the patches are still 'dirty' but should work - I've checked > them on a bunch of hardware. > you need to run it like: > > flashrom -V -p internal -l this_file.layout -i BIOS -r bios_dump.bin > I got: Layout files are currently supported for write operations only. I thought you mean the read operation would work. -- Rui Paulo

2 1

Re: [flashrom] [PATCH] Detect Android target OS.
by Stefan Tauner 24 Dec '15

24 Dec '15

On Wed, 16 Dec 2015 01:00:15 +0100 Stefan Tauner <stefan.tauner(a)alumni.tuwien.ac.at> wrote: > No other changes are required to build flashrom (excluding programmers > with NEED_PCI) on Android. > > Signed-off-by: Stefan Tauner <stefan.tauner(a)alumni.tuwien.ac.at> > --- > os.h | 7 ++++++- > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/os.h b/os.h > index 2e6dbaa..e5f72e4 100644 > --- a/os.h > +++ b/os.h > @@ -58,6 +58,11 @@ > #define __FLASHROM_OS__ "libpayload" > // Linux > #elif defined(__linux__) > -#define __FLASHROM_OS__ "Linux" > + // There are various flags in use on Android apparently. __ANDROID__ seems to be the most trustworthy. > + #if defined(__ANDROID__) > + #define __FLASHROM_OS__ "Android" > + #else > + #define __FLASHROM_OS__ "Linux" > + #endif > #endif > __FLASHROM_OS__ I'll add this change to my tested stuff branch to be committed within two weeks. -- Kind regards/Mit freundlichen Grüßen, Stefan Tauner

1 0

S25FL128S - erase fails
by Jim Houston 23 Dec '15

23 Dec '15

Hi I'm playing with a Spansion S25FL128SAGMF1000 and running flashrom on a raspberrypi. I started with a new chip and was successful writing and reading back a random image. It fails when I try to erase the part. Probing this part gives several possible chip names and I picked "S25FL128S......0". I'm assuming that the 0 vs. 1 suffix is selecting 64k vs. 256k sector size. I may put some effort into chasing the erase problem. Is there anyone currently working on this? Jim Houston

3 3

Successful write report S25FL016A
by Márton Miklós 23 Dec '15

23 Dec '15

Hello all, I have successfully flashed a Dell D830 notebook (with discrete NVIDIA VGA) using flashrom from A14 BIOS revision to A17. This means two things: the notebook itself is supported, and the S25FL016A could be marked as verified for probe, read, erase, write. For the later one I have created a patch. I have forgotten to run lspci -vvvv, but I will do that and create a board enable patch soon. -- Regards, Miklos Marton

2 2

N25Q128..1E flashed successfully
by Márton Miklós 23 Dec '15

23 Dec '15

Hello all, I have successfully flashed a N25Q128..1E SPI flash using flashrom with a 16MB image. The programmer was an external one: NI USB-8452. This is not supported in the mainline yet, but patch is coming soon. /Flashing output (I have forgotten to //run with -V//):// //flashrom v0.9.7-unknown on Linux 3.13.0-70-generic (x86_64)// //flashrom is free software, get the source code at http://www.flashrom.org// // //Calibrating delay loop... OK.// //Found USB device (3923:7514).// //USB-8452 IO voltage set to: 1.8 V// //USB-8452 SCK frequency set to: 50.00 MHz// //Found Micron/Numonyx/ST flash chip "N25Q128..1E" (16384 kB, SPI) on usb8451_spi.// //===// //This flash part has status UNTESTED for operations: PROBE READ ERASE WRITE// //The test status of this chip may have been updated in the latest development// //version of flashrom. If you are running the latest development version,// //please email a report to flashrom(a)flashrom.org if any of the above operations// //work correctly for you with this flash part. Please include the flashrom// //output with the additional -V option for all operations you tested (-V, -Vr,// //-VE, -Vw), and mention which mainboard or programmer you tested.// //Please mention your board in the subject line. Thanks for your help!// //Reading old flash chip contents... done.// //Erasing and writing flash chip... // //Erase/write done.// //Verifying flash... VERIFIED. /Patch attached./ / -- Regards, Miklos Marton

2 1

W836xx: Lenovo B50-70: flashrom -V
by Bernhard Reiter 23 Dec '15

23 Dec '15

flashrom v0.9.7-r1852 on Linux 4.2.0-22-generic (x86_64) flashrom is free software, get the source code at http://www.flashrom.org flashrom was built with libpci 3.2.1, GCC 4.9.1, little endian Command line (3 args): flashrom -V -p internal Calibrating delay loop... OS timer resolution is 1 usecs, 2684M loops per second, 10 myus = 10 us, 100 myus = 124 us, 1000 myus = 1021 us, 10000 myus = 10128 us, 4 myus = 4 us, OK. Initializing internal programmer No coreboot table found. Using Internal DMI decoder. DMI string chassis-type: "Notebook" Laptop detected via DMI. DMI string system-manufacturer: "LENOVO" DMI string system-product-name: "80EU" DMI string system-version: "Lenovo B50-70" DMI string baseboard-manufacturer: "LENOVO" DMI string baseboard-product-name: "Lenovo B50-70" DMI string baseboard-version: "00000000NO DPK" W836xx enter config mode worked or we were already in config mode. W836xx leave config mode had no effect. Active config mode, unknown reg 0x20 ID: fc. Please send the output of "flashrom -V -p internal" to flashrom(a)flashrom.org with W836xx: your board name: flashrom -V as the subject to help us finish support for your Super I/O. Thanks.

1 0

Re: [flashrom] BIOS on my PC. Need a little help or advise.
by Benjamin Bellec 22 Dec '15

22 Dec '15

Hello Alan, Did you tried to do clear CMOS to see if it fixes your issue to boot on the CD/DVD ? Anyway, if you want to upgrade your BIOS, you will first need a valid BIOS image of your computer/motherboard. Do you have it ? Regards. 2015-12-19 5:27 GMT+01:00 Alan Bruce <alandbruce(a)gmail.com>: > I did go to the FAQ on your website and clicked on "How Do I Use > Flashrom". The attached screenshot is what I got. So, how do I use this > program. I would not mind paying someone a few bucks to remotely re > configure my BIOS. I think that it has been hacked and modified. > > On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 6:32 PM, Alan Bruce <alandbruce(a)gmail.com> wrote: > >> Name is Alan. I am running an older Compaq Presario Desktop PC the model >> number is SR2264WM. it is an AMD 64 Athlion model. The operating system >> is Ubuntu 10.04. I just loved this OS and failed to upgrade before it was >> too late as it is now unsupported. So I downloaded Ubuntu 15.04 and was >> preparing to install it. All of a sudden my BIOS will not go to the boot >> menu when I press the ESC key upon startup, like it used to do. Although I >> downloaded flashrom from the Ubuntu Software Center, I am unable to find it >> on my PC and access the program to reset my BIOS. So how do I access this >> program? Your suggestions and advise will be greatly appreciated. >> > > > _______________________________________________ > flashrom mailing list > flashrom(a)flashrom.org > http://www.flashrom.org/mailman/listinfo/flashrom >

1 0

W836xx:ThinkPad Edge E130:335852G
by Всеволод Балашов 21 Dec '15

21 Dec '15

1 0

W836xx: Dell Inc.0RRH3K: flashrom -V
by Christophe CHAMOT 21 Dec '15

21 Dec '15

Hello, I know it is a laptop :-( I'm not waiting for a fix, it is just to feed the database of boards… ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- flashrom v0.9.7-r1782 on Linux 3.16.0-4-amd64 (x86_64) flashrom is free software, get the source code at http://www.flashrom.org flashrom was built with libpci 3.2.1, GCC 4.8.2, little endian Command line (3 args): flashrom -V -p internal Calibrating delay loop... OS timer resolution is 1 usecs, 1651M loops per second, 10 myus = 11 us, 100 myus = 107 us, 1000 myus = 967 us, 10000 myus = 9641 us, 4 myus = 4 us, OK. Initializing internal programmer No coreboot table found. Using Internal DMI decoder. DMI string chassis-type: "Laptop" Laptop detected via DMI. DMI string system-manufacturer: "Dell Inc." DMI string system-product-name: "Precision M4500" DMI string system-version: "0001" DMI string baseboard-manufacturer: "Dell Inc." DMI string baseboard-product-name: "0RRH3K" DMI string baseboard-version: "A03" ======================================================================== WARNING! You seem to be running flashrom on an unsupported laptop. Laptops, notebooks and netbooks are difficult to support and we recommend to use the vendor flashing utility. The embedded controller (EC) in these machines often interacts badly with flashing. See the manpage and http://www.flashrom.org/Laptops for details. If flash is shared with the EC, erase is guaranteed to brick your laptop and write may brick your laptop. Read and probe may irritate your EC and cause fan failure, backlight failure and sudden poweroff. You have been warned. ======================================================================== Aborting. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Thx for all you're doing guys, Christophe

1 0

Re: [flashrom] BIOS on my PC. Need a little help or advise.
by Alan Bruce 19 Dec '15

19 Dec '15

I did go to the FAQ on your website and clicked on "How Do I Use Flashrom". The attached screenshot is what I got. So, how do I use this program. I would not mind paying someone a few bucks to remotely re configure my BIOS. I think that it has been hacked and modified. On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 6:32 PM, Alan Bruce <alandbruce(a)gmail.com> wrote: > Name is Alan. I am running an older Compaq Presario Desktop PC the model > number is SR2264WM. it is an AMD 64 Athlion model. The operating system > is Ubuntu 10.04. I just loved this OS and failed to upgrade before it was > too late as it is now unsupported. So I downloaded Ubuntu 15.04 and was > preparing to install it. All of a sudden my BIOS will not go to the boot > menu when I press the ESC key upon startup, like it used to do. Although I > downloaded flashrom from the Ubuntu Software Center, I am unable to find it > on my PC and access the program to reset my BIOS. So how do I access this > program? Your suggestions and advise will be greatly appreciated. >

1 0

BIOS on my PC. Need a little help or advise.
by Alan Bruce 19 Dec '15

19 Dec '15

Name is Alan. I am running an older Compaq Presario Desktop PC the model number is SR2264WM. it is an AMD 64 Athlion model. The operating system is Ubuntu 10.04. I just loved this OS and failed to upgrade before it was too late as it is now unsupported. So I downloaded Ubuntu 15.04 and was preparing to install it. All of a sudden my BIOS will not go to the boot menu when I press the ESC key upon startup, like it used to do. Although I downloaded flashrom from the Ubuntu Software Center, I am unable to find it on my PC and access the program to reset my BIOS. So how do I access this program? Your suggestions and advise will be greatly appreciated.

1 0

flashrom can successfully read the BIOS image of my Amilo Xi3650 laptop
by Elmar Stellnberger 17 Dec '15

17 Dec '15

Lately I have tried > flashrom -p internal:laptop=force_I_want_a_brick --read Xi3650.rom on my Fujitsu Siemens Amilo Xi 3650 laptop and it has worked quite well. ... Found chipset "Intel ICH9M-E". Found Winbond flash chip "W25X16" (2048 kB, SPI) at physical address 0xffe00000. > sha256sum Xi3650.rom 8c5095d38bffe9b87d481ba8da395e48d9dcfadd43176979fd69e5da249b3763 Xi3650.rom BIOS (according to dmidecode) is Vendor: Phoenix Version: 1.0H-1646-0024 Release Date: 04/15/2010 I would love to see it under 'supported boards' in the future. More information can be found in the attachements.

1 1

Re: [flashrom] FAILED: Lenovo X1 (2015)
by Stefan Tauner 17 Dec '15

17 Dec '15

On Thu, 17 Dec 2015 13:08:56 +0300 Антон Кочков <anton.kochkov(a)gmail.com> wrote: > Hello! > Mainstream flashrom currently not yet merged patches, adding support > of reading layout. Because ME region usually not readable not from ME > itself, > it should be skipped, so using layout file, in your case: > # flashrom layout v2 > 0x00000000:0x00000fff descr > 0x00500000:0x00ffffff BIOS > 0x00003000:0x004fffff ME > 0x00001000:0x00002fff GbE > > And using flashrom with my patches should help: > https://github.com/XVilka/flashrom/tree/layout_descriptor > > Some of the patches are still 'dirty' but should work - I've checked > them on a bunch of hardware. > you need to run it like: > > flashrom -V -p internal -l this_file.layout -i BIOS -r bios_dump.bin And, most importantly: they will not help you in writing anything because there are a number of other restrictions in your configuration. -- Kind regards/Mit freundlichen Grüßen, Stefan Tauner

2 1

FAILED: Lenovo X1 (2015)
by Rui Paulo 17 Dec '15

17 Dec '15

Hi, I tried to dump the BIOS on my Lenovo X1 using flashrom and it didn't work. I'm using flashrom from svn trunk. Any ideas? flashrom v0.9.8-r1901 on Linux 4.2.0-1-amd64 (x86_64) flashrom is free software, get the source code at http://www.flashrom.o rg flashrom was built with libpci 3.3.1, GCC 5.2.1 20151028, little endian Command line (6 args): ./flashrom -VVp internal -c MX25L12805D --read a.rom Calibrating delay loop... OS timer resolution is 1 usecs, 2883M loops per second, 10 myus = 10 us, 100 myus = 122 us, 1000 myus = 1018 us, 10000 myus = 10335 us, 4 myus = 15 us, OK. Initializing internal programmer No coreboot table found. Using Internal DMI decoder. No DMI table found. W836xx enter config mode worked or we were already in config mode. W836xx leave config mode had no effect. Active config mode, unknown reg 0x20 ID: 00. Please send the output of "flashrom -V -p internal" to flashrom(a)flashrom.org with W836xx: your board name: flashrom -V as the subject to help us finish support for your Super I/O. Thanks. Found chipset "Intel Broadwell U Premium" with PCI ID 8086:9cc3. This chipset is marked as untested. If you are using an up-to-date version of flashrom *and* were (not) able to successfully update your firmware with it, then please email a report to flashrom(a)flashrom.org including a verbose (-V) log. Thank you! Enabling flash write... Root Complex Register Block address = 0xfed1c000 GCS = 0x21: BIOS Interface Lock-Down: enabled, Boot BIOS Straps: 0x0 (LPC) Top Swap: not enabled 0xfff80000/0xffb80000 FWH IDSEL: 0x0 0xfff00000/0xffb00000 FWH IDSEL: 0x0 0xffe80000/0xffa80000 FWH IDSEL: 0x1 0xffe00000/0xffa00000 FWH IDSEL: 0x1 0xffd80000/0xff980000 FWH IDSEL: 0x2 0xffd00000/0xff900000 FWH IDSEL: 0x2 0xffc80000/0xff880000 FWH IDSEL: 0x3 0xffc00000/0xff800000 FWH IDSEL: 0x3 0xff700000/0xff300000 FWH IDSEL: 0x4 0xff600000/0xff200000 FWH IDSEL: 0x5 0xff500000/0xff100000 FWH IDSEL: 0x6 0xff400000/0xff000000 FWH IDSEL: 0x7 0xfff80000/0xffb80000 FWH decode enabled 0xfff00000/0xffb00000 FWH decode enabled 0xffe80000/0xffa80000 FWH decode enabled 0xffe00000/0xffa00000 FWH decode enabled 0xffd80000/0xff980000 FWH decode enabled 0xffd00000/0xff900000 FWH decode enabled 0xffc80000/0xff880000 FWH decode enabled 0xffc00000/0xff800000 FWH decode enabled 0xff700000/0xff300000 FWH decode enabled 0xff600000/0xff200000 FWH decode enabled 0xff500000/0xff100000 FWH decode enabled 0xff400000/0xff000000 FWH decode enabled Maximum FWH chip size: 0x100000 bytes SPI Read Configuration: prefetching enabled, caching enabled, BIOS_CNTL = 0x2a: BIOS Lock Enable: enabled, BIOS Write Enable: disabled Warning: BIOS region SMM protection is enabled! Warning: Setting Bios Control at 0xdc from 0x2a to 0x09 failed. New value is 0x2a. SPIBAR = 0x00007f030f57a000 + 0x3800 0x04: 0xe008 (HSFS) HSFS: FDONE=0, FCERR=0, AEL=0, BERASE=1, SCIP=0, FDOPSS=1, FDV=1, FLOCKDN=1 Warning: SPI Configuration Lockdown activated. Reading OPCODES... done OP Type Pre-OP op[0]: 0x5a, read w/o addr, none op[1]: 0x9f, read w/o addr, none op[2]: 0x05, read w/o addr, none op[3]: 0x01, write w/o addr, none op[4]: 0x03, read w/ addr, none op[5]: 0x15, read w/o addr, none op[6]: 0xff, read w/o addr, none op[7]: 0xff, read w/o addr, none Pre-OP 0: 0x06, Pre-OP 1: 0x06 0x06: 0x0004 (HSFC) HSFC: FGO=0, FCYCLE=2, FDBC=0, SME=0 0x08: 0x00003000 (FADDR) 0x50: 0x00004a4b (FRAP) BMWAG 0x00, BMRAG 0x00, BRWA 0x4a, BRRA 0x4b 0x54: 0x00000000 FREG0: Warning: Flash Descriptor region (0x00000000- 0x00000fff) is read-only. 0x58: 0x0fff0500 FREG1: BIOS region (0x00500000-0x00ffffff) is read- write. 0x5C: 0x04ff0003 FREG2: Warning: Management Engine region (0x00003000- 0x004fffff) is locked. 0x60: 0x00020001 FREG3: Gigabit Ethernet region (0x00001000-0x00002fff) is read-write. 0x64: 0x00007fff FREG4: Platform Data region is unused. Not all flash regions are freely accessible by flashrom. This is most likely due to an active ME. Please see http://flashrom.org/ME for details. 0x74: 0x00000000 (PR0 is unused) 0x78: 0x8fff0eb0 PR1: Warning: 0x00eb0000-0x00ffffff is read-only. 0x7C: 0x8e2f0df1 PR2: Warning: 0x00df1000-0x00e2ffff is read-only. 0x80: 0x8df00df0 PR3: Warning: 0x00df0000-0x00df0fff is read-only. 0x84: 0x8def0a00 PR4: Warning: 0x00a00000-0x00deffff is read-only. Writes have been disabled for safety reasons. You can enforce write support with the ich_spi_force programmer option, but you will most likely harm your hardware! If you force flashrom you will get no support if something breaks. On a few mainboards it is possible to enable write access by setting a jumper (see its documentation or the board itself). 0x90: 0xc4 (SSFS) SSFS: SCIP=0, FDONE=1, FCERR=0, AEL=0 0x91: 0xfc0000 (SSFC) SSFC: SCGO=0, ACS=0, SPOP=0, COP=0, DBC=0, SME=0, SCF=4 0x94: 0x0606 (PREOP) 0x96: 0x0240 (OPTYPE) 0x98: 0x01059f5a (OPMENU) 0x9C: 0xffff1503 (OPMENU+4) 0xA0: 0x00000000 (BBAR) 0xC4: 0x80802045 (LVSCC) LVSCC: BES=0x1, WG=1, WSR=0, WEWS=0, EO=0x20, VCL=1 0xC8: 0x00002045 (UVSCC) UVSCC: BES=0x1, WG=1, WSR=0, WEWS=0, EO=0x20 0xD0: 0x50444653 (FPB) Reading flash descriptors mapped by the chipset via FDOC/FDOD... done. === Content Section === FLVALSIG 0x0ff0a55a FLMAP0 0x03040003 FLMAP1 0x15100206 FLMAP2 0x00210120 --- Details --- NR (Number of Regions): 4 FRBA (Flash Region Base Address): 0x040 NC (Number of Components): 1 FCBA (Flash Component Base Address): 0x030 ISL (ICH/PCH Strap Length): 21 FISBA/FPSBA (Flash ICH/PCH Strap Base Address): 0x100 NM (Number of Masters): 3 FMBA (Flash Master Base Address): 0x060 MSL/PSL (MCH/PROC Strap Length): 1 FMSBA (Flash MCH/PROC Strap Base Address): 0x200 === Component Section === FLCOMP 0x49900045 FLILL 0xad604221 --- Details --- Component 1 density: 16 MB Component 2 is not used. Read Clock Frequency: 20 MHz Read ID and Status Clock Freq.: 33 MHz Write and Erase Clock Freq.: 33 MHz Fast Read is supported. Fast Read Clock Frequency: 50 MHz Dual Output Fast Read Support: disabled Invalid instruction 0: 0x21 Invalid instruction 1: 0x42 Invalid instruction 2: 0x60 Invalid instruction 3: 0xad === Region Section === FLREG0 0x00000000 FLREG1 0x0fff0500 FLREG2 0x04ff0003 FLREG3 0x00020001 FLREG4 0x00007fff --- Details --- Region 0 (Descr.) 0x00000000 - 0x00000fff Region 1 (BIOS ) 0x00500000 - 0x00ffffff Region 2 (ME ) 0x00003000 - 0x004fffff Region 3 (GbE ) 0x00001000 - 0x00002fff Region 4 (Platf.) is unused. === Master Section === FLMSTR1 0x0a0b0000 FLMSTR2 0x0c0d0000 FLMSTR3 0x08080118 --- Details --- Descr. BIOS ME GbE Platf. BIOS r rw rw ME r rw rw GbE rw PROBLEMS, continuing anyway The following protocols are supported: FWH, SPI. Probing for Macronix MX25L12805D, 16384 kB: probe_spi_rdid_generic: id1 0xc2, id2 0x2018 Found Macronix flash chip "MX25L12805D" (16384 kB, SPI) mapped at physical address 0x00000000ff000000. Chip status register is 0x40. Chip status register: Status Register Write Disable (SRWD, SRP, ...) is not set Chip status register: Bit 6 is set Chip status register: Block Protect 3 (BP3) is not set Chip status register: Block Protect 2 (BP2) is not set Chip status register: Block Protect 1 (BP1) is not set Chip status register: Block Protect 0 (BP0) is not set Chip status register: Write Enable Latch (WEL) is not set Chip status register: Write In Progress (WIP/BUSY) is not set This chip may contain one-time programmable memory. flashrom cannot read and may never be able to write it, hence it may not be able to completely clone the contents of this chip (see man page for details). Block protection is disabled. Reading flash... Transaction error! SSFS: SCIP=0, FDONE=1, FCERR=1, AEL=0 SSFC: SCGO=0, ACS=0, SPOP=0, COP=4, DBC=63, SME=0, SCF=4 Running OPCODE 0x03 failed at address 0x003000 (payload length was 64). Read operation failed! FAILED. Restoring MMIO space at 0x7f030f57d8a0 Restoring PCI config space for 00:1f:0 reg 0xdc -- Rui Paulo

2 1

[PATCH] Detect Android target OS.
by Stefan Tauner 16 Dec '15

16 Dec '15

No other changes are required to build flashrom (excluding programmers with NEED_PCI) on Android. Signed-off-by: Stefan Tauner <stefan.tauner(a)alumni.tuwien.ac.at> --- os.h | 7 ++++++- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/os.h b/os.h index 2e6dbaa..e5f72e4 100644 --- a/os.h +++ b/os.h @@ -58,6 +58,11 @@ #define __FLASHROM_OS__ "libpayload" // Linux #elif defined(__linux__) -#define __FLASHROM_OS__ "Linux" + // There are various flags in use on Android apparently. __ANDROID__ seems to be the most trustworthy. + #if defined(__ANDROID__) + #define __FLASHROM_OS__ "Android" + #else + #define __FLASHROM_OS__ "Linux" + #endif #endif __FLASHROM_OS__ -- Kind regards, Stefan Tauner

1 0

Fwd: Your stand proposal for FOSDEM 2016 has been accepted
by Carl-Daniel Hailfinger 15 Dec '15

15 Dec '15

Hello everyone, let's make this our best FOSDEM stand presence ever! https://www.coreboot.org/FOSDEM_2016 Please fill in https://www.coreboot.org/Talk:FOSDEM_2016 if you're coming. Regards, Carl-Daniel -------- Forwarded Message -------- From: FOSDEM Stands Team <stands(a)fosdem.org> To: Carl-Daniel <c-d.hailfinger.devel.2006(a)gmx.net> Subject: Your stand proposal for FOSDEM 2016 has been accepted Message-Id: <20151214195515.C04A3CB582(a)mailhost.gletsjer.net> Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2015 20:54:56 +0100 (CET) Hi Carl-Daniel, The FOSDEM stands team is glad to be able to inform you that your request for a stand for 'coreboot_flashrom' has been accepted. There will be two tables reserved for you. Like most years, we received roughly twice as many requests for stands as we have tables available. We have aimed to grant as many requests as feasible and to increase the diversity of the accepted stands. Because of this, we have unfortunately had to reduce the space available for a number of regular attendees, as well as reject some projects that have been present in previous years years. You will receive further information about what's expected of you closer to the event date. Looking forward to seeing you at FOSDEM 2016! Kind regards, Wynke Stulemeijer FOSDEM stands team

1 0

Re: [flashrom] Add option to disable the reading back of the flash contents at write operation
by Márton Miklós 12 Dec '15

12 Dec '15

Hello David, Thank you for your response! Your answer makes sense for me. In this case it would be useful to refactor the "backupless" writes to read sectors only until a non 0xFF portion found, and then mark that sector erasable or erase immediately. In the case if the flash has non blank region this could speed up the programming, worst case (programming a fully erased chip) it is going to be equal in time. I have not been aware of Nico's patch. Is it already merged to the mainline? If not could you please give me a link to that? Thank you! Regards, Miklos Marton 2015-12-11 21:52 keltezéssel, David Hendricks írta: > Hi Marton, > I respectfully disagree with this approach. Reading the old contents > is not just used for backup. It's used so that flashrom can > selectively erase and write blocks which usually saves time because > erase and write operations are orders of magnitude slower than reads > on NOR flash. > > So, it's not a bad thing to support this option, but I think there is > little benefit and can actually make the process slower in most cases. > (Your case might be different, of course) > > Nico Huber's unbounded read patch should help reduce the initial read > time by a large factor (~90% reduction). Try marking your chip as > tested for unbounded reads. You might find that the read and selective > erase/write is faster than unconditional erase/write. > > > On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 12:01 PM, Márton Miklós > <martonmiklosqdev(a)gmail.com <mailto:martonmiklosqdev@gmail.com>> wrote: > > Hello all, > > I am using the flashrom with an external programmer to flash > various SPI flashes a lot. > In most cases I do not care about the old flash contents when > flashing, so the "/Reading old flash chip contents/" step does not > have any added value in my use cases. The code also has a FIXME > note where this is hardcoded to make it configurable in the > future. I would like to patch it if possible. > > Please propose me command line arguments for disabling it. My > proposal: > /-N | --nobackup skip reading back old flash contents before write/ > > I know -N could be confused with -n but the same applies to the -v > (verify) and -V (verbose). > I also could live without the short argument, but that would break > the "standard". > > Thanks in advance for your feedback! > > -- > Regards, > Miklos Marton > > > _______________________________________________ > flashrom mailing list > flashrom(a)flashrom.org <mailto:flashrom@flashrom.org> > http://www.flashrom.org/mailman/listinfo/flashrom > > > > > -- > David Hendricks (dhendrix) > Systems Software Engineer, Google Inc.

1 0

Add option to disable the reading back of the flash contents at write operation
by Márton Miklós 11 Dec '15

11 Dec '15

Hello all, I am using the flashrom with an external programmer to flash various SPI flashes a lot. In most cases I do not care about the old flash contents when flashing, so the "/Reading old flash chip contents/" step does not have any added value in my use cases. The code also has a FIXME note where this is hardcoded to make it configurable in the future. I would like to patch it if possible. Please propose me command line arguments for disabling it. My proposal: /-N | --nobackup skip reading back old flash contents before write/ I know -N could be confused with -n but the same applies to the -v (verify) and -V (verbose). I also could live without the short argument, but that would break the "standard". Thanks in advance for your feedback! -- Regards, Miklos Marton

2 1

Problems flashing N25Q064A13ESE40E SPI chip
by Ruben Van de Put 11 Dec '15

11 Dec '15

Hello, I'm having some problems flashing a SPI chip with the BusPirate V3. Writing the image is successful but verification is not successful. First try with chip on breadboard and long leads (20-25cm): http://paste.flashrom.org/view.php?id=2841 Then I shortened the signal leads and soldered them directly on the BusPirate: http://paste.flashrom.org/view.php?id=2842 Then I soldered all leads directly on the chip (with an adapter) instead of using a breadboard: http://paste.flashrom.org/view.php?id=2844 I also tried lowering the SPI speed to 1 MHz: http://paste.flashrom.org/view.php?id=2845 Current set-up [image: Inline afbeelding 1] [image: Inline afbeelding 2] Chip datasheet: http://www.farnell.com/datasheets/1674442.pdf Flash connected in this way: http://flashrom.org/Bus_Pirate Is there anything else I can try or should I try replacing the flash chip? Kind regards, Ruben Van de Put

1 0

W836xx:HP DL145 G3
by Jeff 09 Dec '15

09 Dec '15

I'm not sure if you still need this input but the program requested it. Hope it helps!

1 0

W836xx: ??????????: flashrom -V
by Alexis BRENON 06 Dec '15

06 Dec '15

# sudo flashrom -V -p internal flashrom v0.9.8-r1888 on Linux 4.2.5-1-ARCH (x86_64) flashrom is free software, get the source code at http://www.flashrom.org flashrom was built with libpci 3.3.0, GCC 4.9.2 20150204 (prerelease), little endian Command line (3 args): flashrom -V -p internal Calibrating delay loop... OS timer resolution is 1 usecs, 2658M loops per second, 10 myus = 10 us, 100 myus = 125 us, 1000 myus = 1012 us, 10000 myus = 9948 us, 4 myus = 15 us, OK. Initializing internal programmer No coreboot table found. Using Internal DMI decoder. DMI string chassis-type: "Portable" Laptop detected via DMI. DMI string system-manufacturer: "Dell Inc. " DMI string system-product-name: "Inspiron 7437" DMI string system-version: "Not Specified" DMI string baseboard-manufacturer: "Dell Inc. " DMI string baseboard-product-name: " " DMI string baseboard-version: " " W836xx enter config mode worked or we were already in config mode. W836xx leave config mode had no effect. Active config mode, unknown reg 0x20 ID: fc. Please send the output of "flashrom -V -p internal" to flashrom(a)flashrom.org with W836xx: your board name: flashrom -V as the subject to help us finish support for your Super I/O. Thanks. ======================================================================== WARNING! You seem to be running flashrom on an unsupported laptop. Laptops, notebooks and netbooks are difficult to support and we recommend to use the vendor flashing utility. The embedded controller (EC) in these machines often interacts badly with flashing. See the manpage and http://www.flashrom.org/Laptops for details. If flash is shared with the EC, erase is guaranteed to brick your laptop and write may brick your laptop. Read and probe may irritate your EC and cause fan failure, backlight failure and sudden poweroff. You have been warned. ======================================================================== Aborting. Error: Programmer initialization failed.

1 0

Re: [flashrom] Question - Help
by Jim Houston 06 Dec '15

06 Dec '15

On 12/05/2015 03:01 PM, Neb Radojkovic wrote: > > I joined flashrom in hope that it will help me. I have an older HP > small-factor desktop computer where the BIOS > is somewhat limited for any adjusting/ changes. It takes forever to > boot to any OS I load and I was hoping that > by flashing and getting an open BIOS things will get faster and better. > Now, I have no real knowledge for doing so - I am an old guy who would > like to think that I can find enough info > to do so. Is this the place that can help me for my task? > Hi Neb, Yes this probably the wrong list for this discussion. There are much easier ways to save time. There is the obvious risk of installing a BIOS which doesn't work and turning your PC into a brick. It sounds like you are hoping for a script to follow - it isn't that easy. I'm new to this list too and planning to use flashrom to backup the prom in a router before trying an open source firmware. Flashrom might be part of the process but you should start by looking at the firmware you plan to use. One project doing a BIOS replacement is coreboot.org. They have lists of supported hardware. It is important to understand that hardware vendors may use the same name for different hardware. Close isn't good enough. Jim Houston

1 0

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

flashrom