flashrom January 2018

flashrom@flashrom.org

26 participants
45 discussions

Re: [flashrom] New SPI NOR Flash product Support
by Stefan Tauner 15 Aug '19

15 Aug '19

On Mon, 9 May 2016 20:46:18 -0700 David Hendricks <dhendrix(a)google.com> wrote: > Hi Victor, > From Flashrom's software perspective all chips with the same ID are > indistinguishable. > > Part number often includes characteristics such as package and thermal > tolerance which do not affect software compatibility. However, we will add the new names to the in-program (and hence wiki) database so that this new information becomes public. Thanks for the heads up, Victor. … [View More]

4 4

80/100/132 column line width policy
by Carl-Daniel Hailfinger 15 Dec '18

15 Dec '18

Hi, we're hitting the 80 column limit in our code in ways which actually reduce readability for the code. Examples are various multiline messages and complicated nested code where refactoring to a separate function doesn't make sense. Keeping the old 80 column limit is not really an option anymore. Standard terminal sizes have one of 80, 100 or 132 columns. Given the monitor resolutions many people have nowadays, I think it is safe to say that you can fit two xterms with 100 columns … [View More]

7 9

FOSDEM Hardware Enablement Devroom
by Paul Kocialkowski 04 Dec '18

04 Dec '18

A Hardware Enablement devroom will be taking place at FOSDEM this year, on Sunday 10 December 2017. This newly-created devroom is the result of 3 proposals that were merged together. It is co-organized by several individuals. The devroom covers all aspects related to hardware enablement and support with free software, including aspects related to boot software, firmwares, drivers and userspace tools and adaptation. Proposals for talks related to these topics are welcome and can be submitted … [View More]

3 3

Building on Windows with mingw
by Miklos Marton 28 Feb '18

28 Feb '18

Hello all, I have tried to build the flashrom with mingw on Windows, but the build process fails with: flash.h:336:1: error: '__MINGW_PRINTF_FORMAT' is an unrecognized format function type [-Werror=format=] __attribute__((format(__MINGW_PRINTF_FORMAT, 2, 3))); I have checked the stdio.h shipped with the mingw installation, but it does not contains the __MINGW_PRINTF_FORMAT macro. I have used the latest available mingw-get-setup, because the 20110530 version (which … [View More]

3 5

Failed flash on Intel Bay Trail platform
by Quinn Plattel 01 Feb '18

01 Feb '18

Hi, Just tried to contact you guys via irc chat. Here is the transcript: 13:47 -!- Irssi: Join to #flashrom was synced in 1 secs 13:47 < quinn> hello, need help with a failed flash on an Intel Bay Trail platform. 13:48 < quinn> Detected flash chip is Winbond W25Q64.W 8192 kB, SPI mapped at phy addr 0xff800000 13:50 < quinn> System is an industry pc with model LEC-3030T 13:51 < quinn> Bios made by Aptio. 13:52 < quinn> dmidecode says … [View More]

2 2

Github PRs
by Miklos Marton 30 Jan '18

30 Jan '18

Hello flashrom developers! I have submitted two PRs to github (as the wiki mentions it is also a possible contribution channel). Do I need to do anything else with that? I am not intended to seems to be impatient I just would like to make sure that everything is in place (this is my first contribution to flashrom this way). If I remember correctly the coreboot gerrit was used to do code review. Is it going to be moved there or we will perform the code review at the github? -- Best regards, Miklos Marton

2 1

What's the intended license for flashrom?
by Nico Huber 30 Jan '18

30 Jan '18

Hi folks, I've just noticed that most of flashrom is licensed under GPLv2 + any later version, while about a third of the code base is GPLv2 only. I wonder if that is intentional, or if any of the license headers was just copy pasted and spread too much? Does somebody know any previous discussion on the topic? Nico

3 4

new whitelists for thinkpad r400, t500
by Leah Rowe 28 Jan '18

28 Jan '18

Hi, Here are some patches for flashrom, which adds whitelist for: ThinkPad R400 ThinkPad T500 Also Taurinus X200, which is a version of the ThinkPad X200 with libreboot, with boardinfo modified slightly

1 0

x1 Carbon 1st Gen Boots to Black Screen
by realraw＠tuta.io 27 Jan '18

27 Jan '18

Followed the coreboot wiki entry perfectly, and had no issues reading the flash chip. The 4MB Bios chip in my x1 differs from the Wiki Entry: Found Micron/Numonyx/ST flash chip "N25Q032..3E" (4096 kB, SPI) on linux_spi. Not sure if that impacts anything, however booting I am faced with a Black Screen. Fan is not running at all, and appears nothing is happening. I found this link as well: http://coreboot.coreboot.narkive.com/zUOsG1zN/lenovo-x1-carbon-3460-screen-… Flashed the … [View More]

2 1

Re: [flashrom] ERASE FAILED on Macronix Bios Chip x220 (Expected 0xff, Found=0x5a)
by Nico Huber 27 Jan '18

27 Jan '18

Hi realraw, you dropped the mailing list in your reply; by accident, I assume. On 27.01.2018 11:01, realraw(a)tuta.io wrote: > The stock bios is currently set at 1.40 and I decided I was going to try > to update to the latest BIOS. However the stock BIOS update utility > does not work, and neither does the USB Bios Boot Utility. Now I see an > error pop up on boot saying, 'Intel ME is in Recovery Mode'. The ME is a microcontroller built into the chipset. You always have to … [View More]assume that it's running while you flash externally, so it's not unlikely that it gets confused. > > I believe the BIOS has some sort of write protection on, that will not > allow me to erase the BIOS. Is there anything that can be done besides > physically removing the BIOS chip and swapping it for another? The BIOS has no means to control the flash chip, while the system is shut down. Removing the chip to flash, should always work, though. I don't see any reason to swap the chip. > > My setup is the Pomona SOIC 8 Pin clip, female to female jumpers and the > RPi3. I am SSHing into the Pi3 from my w530, and issuing the commands > through that. The RPi3 is connected via the standard power cable that > came with it, and the Thinkpad has Wake - On LAN enabled, but at this > point I believe the issue had to do with something other than my > equipment. Currently the BIOS is on version 1.40, and it was a custom > BIOS that had been floating around the internet. What I missed was what device you are trying to flash. I figured it now from the subject line. I little hidden, IMHO. You should always mention what you are trying to do in the email's body. I'm confident that your problem is not related to any write-protection (nobody else run into such issues with an X220, AFAIK). There are basi- cally two ways to flash an X220: 1. Remove all power (battery + AC) from the board and power the flash chip over the clip. This is generally discouraged unless you know exactly that the other chips on your board are protected against powering up as well (some ThinkPads have a diode on the VCC trace to the flash chip for that). You connect VCC to the clip in this case. 2. Wake-on-LAN state: Use the regular AC to power the board but keep the machine shut down. In this state a lot of components on the board are already active, including the flash chip. Do not attach VCC through the clip, if you do this! I would generally recommend 2. if you have a multimeter and can check that the flash chip is indeed powered. When you attach a network cable you can also see if the LEDs at the ethernet port light up, but this is no 100% reliable indication. Last but not least, the flash chip has two pins /HOLD and /WP that should be pulled up (to VCC). The mainboard should already take care of that, but you should check with a multimeter if that is the case. If not, or if you can't verify it, you should pull these two pins high. Hope that helps, Nico [View Less]

1 0

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

flashrom January 2018