flashrom September 2014

flashrom@flashrom.org

23 participants
40 discussions

by Pablo Cases

Hi, Browsed through the code and noticed a possible typo in sp25_statusreg.c: spi_prettyprint_status_register_bp (r1850) Shouldn't Block Protect 4 bit be shifted 6 steps instead of 5? ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ /* Common block protection (BP) bits. */ static void spi_prettyprint_status_register_bp(uint8_t status, int bp) { switch (bp) { /* Fall through. */ case 4: msg_cdbg("Chip status register: Block Protect 4 (BP4) is %sset\n", (status & (1 << 5)) ? "" : "not "); case 3: msg_cdbg("Chip status register: Block Protect 3 (BP3) is %sset\n", (status & (1 << 5)) ? "" : "not "); case 2: msg_cdbg("Chip status register: Block Protect 2 (BP2) is %sset\n", (status & (1 << 4)) ? "" : "not "); case 1: msg_cdbg("Chip status register: Block Protect 1 (BP1) is %sset\n", (status & (1 << 3)) ? "" : "not "); case 0: msg_cdbg("Chip status register: Block Protect 0 (BP0) is %sset\n", (status & (1 << 2)) ? "" : "not "); } } ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------- Pablo Cases, M.Sc. Senior Software Engineer FlatFrog Laboratories AB Traktorvägen 11

5 years, 11 months

Re: [flashrom] Dediprog SF100 problem

by Pablo Cases

I submitted a patch two weeks ago for SF100 with firmware version 5.5.1, but it has not been acked yet though. My (limited) experience with flashrom was that the mainline does not support SF100 with 5.5.1 firmware. Amongst the problems I encountered was that the Read Status Register 1 reply was incorrect for (at least) WEL and BUSY bits on a standalone W25Q64BV part. Possibly the other bits (e.g. SRP0) were also affected… So if you can’t find a hardware reason for your problems you could check if my patch solves your problems. /Regards, Pablo -------------------------------- Senior Software Engineer FlatFrog Laboratories AB From: flashrom [mailto:flashrom-bounces@flashrom.org] On Behalf Of David Hendricks Sent: Wednesday, September 10, 2014 12:48 AM To: Sofer, Yehoshua Cc: flashrom(a)flashrom.org Subject: Re: [flashrom] Dediprog SF100 problem On Tue, Sep 9, 2014 at 4:43 AM, Sofer, Yehoshua <yehoshua.sofer(a)intel.com<mailto:yehoshua.sofer@intel.com>> wrote: Hi, I have Dediprog SF100 programmer with firmware version 5.5.1 When I try to write to the chip I got an error: “Some block protection in effect, disabling... Block protection could not be disabled!” Is there any way to resolve this? Is the chip you are trying to reprogram soldered onto the mainboard and, if so, is the write-protect pin grounded? Does the chip you are using have a "one time program" function enabled that will permanently enable block protection regardless of the write-protect pin state? For example, if you have a W25Q64DW and both SRP1 and SRP0 are set, then the status register protect bits become permanently locked. Regards, Yehoshua Sofer Platform Application Engineering – Israel [cid:image001.jpg@01CC3EF1.1A8ED330] Networking Division, Intel Corporation • yehoshua.sofer(a)intel.com<mailto:yehoshua.sofer@intel.com> Cell +972 (54)3239840<tel:%2B972%20%2854%293239840> --------------------------------------------------------------------- Intel Israel (74) Limited This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies. _______________________________________________ flashrom mailing list flashrom(a)flashrom.org<mailto:flashrom@flashrom.org> http://www.flashrom.org/mailman/listinfo/flashrom -- David Hendricks (dhendrix) Systems Software Engineer, Google Inc.

5 years, 11 months

[PATCH] Fix Rangeley/Baytrail ich_desc density issues (09/10)

by Tai-Hong (Type) Wu

Dear flashrom list, This patch tries to fix comp1/2_density issues on Rangeley/Baytrail platforms with "dual flash dev installed". Patch is based on r1850, guess it might work as well for r1844 or later rev. Signed-off-by: T.H.Wu Type <thwu(a)lunartoday.com> From: "Type T.H.Wu" <thwu(a)lunartoday.com> Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2014 14:20:54 +0800 Subject: [PATCH] Rangeley/Baytrail comp1/2_density fix --- ich_descriptors.c | 11 +++++------ ich_descriptors.h | 9 ++++++++- 2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) diff --git a/ich_descriptors.c b/ich_descriptors.c index 1966f66..d041149 100644 --- a/ich_descriptors.c +++ b/ich_descriptors.c @@ -127,7 +127,8 @@ static const char *pprint_density(enum ich_chipset cs, const struct ich_descript case CHIPSET_ICH10: case CHIPSET_5_SERIES_IBEX_PEAK: case CHIPSET_6_SERIES_COUGAR_POINT: - case CHIPSET_7_SERIES_PANTHER_POINT: { + case CHIPSET_7_SERIES_PANTHER_POINT: + case CHIPSET_BAYTRAIL: { uint8_t size_enc; if (idx == 0) { size_enc = desc->component.old.comp1_density; @@ -139,7 +140,6 @@ static const char *pprint_density(enum ich_chipset cs, const struct ich_descript return size_str[size_enc]; } case CHIPSET_8_SERIES_LYNX_POINT: - case CHIPSET_BAYTRAIL: case CHIPSET_8_SERIES_LYNX_POINT_LP: case CHIPSET_8_SERIES_WELLSBURG: case CHIPSET_9_SERIES_WILDCAT_POINT: { @@ -216,7 +216,7 @@ void prettyprint_ich_descriptor_component(enum ich_chipset cs, const struct ich_ pprint_freq(cs, desc->component.common.freq_fastread)); if (cs > CHIPSET_6_SERIES_COUGAR_POINT) msg_pdbg2("Dual Output Fast Read Support: %sabled\n", - desc->component.new.dual_output ? "dis" : "en"); + (cs == CHIPSET_BAYTRAIL ? desc->component.old.dual_output : desc->component.new.dual_output) ? "dis" : "en"); if (desc->component.FLILL == 0) msg_pdbg2("No forbidden opcodes.\n"); else { @@ -802,7 +802,6 @@ int getFCBA_component_density(enum ich_chipset cs, const struct ich_descriptors msg_perr("Only ICH SPI component index 0 or 1 are supported yet.\n"); return -1; } - if (desc->content.NC == 0 && idx > 0) return 0; @@ -816,6 +815,7 @@ int getFCBA_component_density(enum ich_chipset cs, const struct ich_descriptors case CHIPSET_5_SERIES_IBEX_PEAK: case CHIPSET_6_SERIES_COUGAR_POINT: case CHIPSET_7_SERIES_PANTHER_POINT: + case CHIPSET_BAYTRAIL: if (idx == 0) { size_enc = desc->component.old.comp1_density; } else { @@ -824,7 +824,6 @@ int getFCBA_component_density(enum ich_chipset cs, const struct ich_descriptors size_max = 5; break; case CHIPSET_8_SERIES_LYNX_POINT: - case CHIPSET_BAYTRAIL: case CHIPSET_8_SERIES_LYNX_POINT_LP: case CHIPSET_8_SERIES_WELLSBURG: case CHIPSET_9_SERIES_WILDCAT_POINT: @@ -842,7 +841,7 @@ int getFCBA_component_density(enum ich_chipset cs, const struct ich_descriptors } if (size_enc > size_max) { - msg_perr("Density of ICH SPI component with index %d is invalid." + msg_perr("Density of ICH SPI component with index %d is invalid.\n" "Encoded density is 0x%x while maximum allowed is 0x%x.\n", idx, size_enc, size_max); return -1; diff --git a/ich_descriptors.h b/ich_descriptors.h index c41f9d9..572ee60 100644 --- a/ich_descriptors.h +++ b/ich_descriptors.h @@ -130,7 +130,14 @@ struct ich_desc_component { comp2_density :3, :11, :13, - :2; + /* + * @ Baytrail & Rangeley FLCOMP: + * (1) Comp[1|2]_desnity := [0:2] | [3:5] + * Max 16MB*2 SPI devices, ie. max value := 101101b + * (2) Daul_output supported as well + */ + dual_output :1, + :1; } old; struct { uint32_t comp1_density :4, /* new since Lynx Point/8 */ -- 1.7.11.7

5 years, 11 months

[commit] r1850 - trunk

by repository service

Author: stefanct Date: Wed Sep 10 01:03:32 2014 New Revision: 1850 URL: http://flashrom.org/trac/flashrom/changeset/1850 Log: Add support for Winbond W25Q40.V chips. Read-tested by Peter Ruesch. Signed-off-by: Stefan Tauner <stefan.tauner(a)alumni.tuwien.ac.at> Acked-by: Stefan Tauner <stefan.tauner(a)alumni.tuwien.ac.at> Modified: trunk/flashchips.c Modified: trunk/flashchips.c ============================================================================== --- trunk/flashchips.c Fri Sep 5 18:14:11 2014 (r1849) +++ trunk/flashchips.c Wed Sep 10 01:03:32 2014 (r1850) @@ -12940,6 +12940,46 @@ { .vendor = "Winbond", + .name = "W25Q40.V", + .bustype = BUS_SPI, + .manufacture_id = WINBOND_NEX_ID, + .model_id = WINBOND_NEX_W25Q40_V, + .total_size = 512, + .page_size = 256, + /* supports SFDP */ + /* OTP: 756B total; read 0x48; write 0x42, erase 0x44, read ID 0x4B */ + .feature_bits = FEATURE_WRSR_WREN | FEATURE_OTP, + .tested = TEST_OK_PR, + .probe = probe_spi_rdid, + .probe_timing = TIMING_ZERO, + .block_erasers = + { + { + .eraseblocks = { {4 * 1024, 128} }, + .block_erase = spi_block_erase_20, + }, { + .eraseblocks = { {32 * 1024, 16} }, + .block_erase = spi_block_erase_52, + }, { + .eraseblocks = { {64 * 1024, 8} }, + .block_erase = spi_block_erase_d8, + }, { + .eraseblocks = { {512 * 1024, 1} }, + .block_erase = spi_block_erase_60, + }, { + .eraseblocks = { {512 * 1024, 1} }, + .block_erase = spi_block_erase_c7, + } + }, + .printlock = spi_prettyprint_status_register_plain, /* TODO: improve */ + .unlock = spi_disable_blockprotect, + .write = spi_chip_write_256, /* Multi I/O supported */ + .read = spi_chip_read, /* Fast read (0x0B) and multi I/O supported */ + .voltage = {2700, 3600}, + }, + + { + .vendor = "Winbond", .name = "W25Q80.V", .bustype = BUS_SPI, .manufacture_id = WINBOND_NEX_ID,

5 years, 11 months

Re: [flashrom] Dediprog SF100 problem

by David Hendricks

On Tue, Sep 9, 2014 at 4:43 AM, Sofer, Yehoshua <yehoshua.sofer(a)intel.com> wrote: > Hi, > > I have Dediprog SF100 programmer with firmware version 5.5.1 > > When I try to write to the chip I got an error: > > “Some block protection in effect, disabling... Block protection could not > be disabled!” > > Is there any way to resolve this? > Is the chip you are trying to reprogram soldered onto the mainboard and, if so, is the write-protect pin grounded? Does the chip you are using have a "one time program" function enabled that will permanently enable block protection regardless of the write-protect pin state? For example, if you have a W25Q64DW and both SRP1 and SRP0 are set, then the status register protect bits become permanently locked. > > > Regards, > > Yehoshua Sofer > > *P*latform *A*pplication *E*ngineering – Israel [image: > cid:image001.jpg@01CC3EF1.1A8ED330] > > *N*etworking* D*ivision, Intel Corporation > > * *yehoshua.sofer(a)intel.com <yehoshua.sofer(a)intel.com>* > > Cell +972 (54)3239840 > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > Intel Israel (74) Limited > > This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for > the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution > by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended > recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies. > > _______________________________________________ > flashrom mailing list > flashrom(a)flashrom.org > http://www.flashrom.org/mailman/listinfo/flashrom > -- David Hendricks (dhendrix) Systems Software Engineer, Google Inc.

5 years, 11 months

Dediprog SF100 problem

by Sofer, Yehoshua

Hi, I have Dediprog SF100 programmer with firmware version 5.5.1 When I try to write to the chip I got an error: "Some block protection in effect, disabling... Block protection could not be disabled!" Is there any way to resolve this? Regards, Yehoshua Sofer Platform Application Engineering - Israel [cid:image001.jpg@01CC3EF1.1A8ED330] Networking Division, Intel Corporation * yehoshua.sofer(a)intel.com<mailto:yehoshua.sofer@intel.com> Cell +972 (54)3239840 --------------------------------------------------------------------- Intel Israel (74) Limited This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies.

5 years, 11 months

W836xx: PCOM-B632VG-E3827-TSDV: flashrom -V

by NghiaHT

-- Hoang Trong Nghia (Mr) Software Engineer Toshiba Software Development (Vietnam) Co., Ltd 16th floor, VIT Building, 519 Kim Ma Street, Ba Dinh District, Hanoi Email: nghia.hoangtrong(a)toshiba-tsdv.com Tel: 84-4-2220 8801 Ext: 137 Note: This e-mail message may contain personal information or confidential information. If you are not the addressee of this message, please delete this message and kindly notify the sender as soon as possible - do not copy, use, or disclose this message. -- This mail was scanned by BitDefender For more information please visit http://www.bitdefender.com

5 years, 11 months

Bug report - Thinkpad X60s

by Ted

x60s@x60s-ThinkPad-X60s:~/Downloads/libreboot_bin/flashrom$ sudo ./flashrom_lenovobios_sst -p internal -r factory.bin flashrom v0.9.7-unknown on Linux 3.2.0-67-generic (i686) flashrom is free software, get the source code at http://www.flashrom.org Calibrating delay loop... delay loop is unreliable, trying to continue OK. Found chipset "Intel ICH7M". Enabling flash write... WARNING: SPI Configuration Lockdown activated. OK. Trying to unmap a nonexisting mapping! Please report a bug at flashrom(a)flashrom.org Trying to unmap a nonexisting mapping! Please report a bug at flashrom(a)flashrom.org Trying to unmap a nonexisting mapping! Please report a bug at flashrom(a)flashrom.org Trying to unmap a nonexisting mapping! Please report a bug at flashrom(a)flashrom.org Trying to unmap a nonexisting mapping! Please report a bug at flashrom(a)flashrom.org Trying to unmap a nonexisting mapping! Please report a bug at flashrom(a)flashrom.org Trying to unmap a nonexisting mapping! Please report a bug at flashrom(a)flashrom.org Trying to unmap a nonexisting mapping! Please report a bug at flashrom(a)flashrom.org Trying to unmap a nonexisting mapping! Please report a bug at flashrom(a)flashrom.org Trying to unmap a nonexisting mapping! Please report a bug at flashrom(a)flashrom.org Trying to unmap a nonexisting mapping! Please report a bug at flashrom(a)flashrom.org Trying to unmap a nonexisting mapping! Please report a bug at flashrom(a)flashrom.org No EEPROM/flash device found. Note: flashrom can never write if the flash chip isn't found automatically. x60s@x60s-ThinkPad-X60s:~/Downloads/libreboot_bin/flashrom$ sudo ./flashrom_lenovobios_macronix -p internal -r factory.bin flashrom v0.9.7-unknown on Linux 3.2.0-67-generic (i686) flashrom is free software, get the source code at http://www.flashrom.org Calibrating delay loop... delay loop is unreliable, trying to continue OK. Found chipset "Intel ICH7M". Enabling flash write... WARNING: SPI Configuration Lockdown activated. OK. Found Macronix flash chip "MX25L1605D/MX25L1608D/MX25L1673E" (2048 kB, SPI) at physical address 0xffe00000. Trying to unmap a nonexisting mapping! Please report a bug at flashrom(a)flashrom.org Trying to unmap a nonexisting mapping! Please report a bug at flashrom(a)flashrom.org Trying to unmap a nonexisting mapping! Please report a bug at flashrom(a)flashrom.org Trying to unmap a nonexisting mapping! Please report a bug at flashrom(a)flashrom.org Trying to unmap a nonexisting mapping! Please report a bug at flashrom(a)flashrom.org Trying to unmap a nonexisting mapping! Please report a bug at flashrom(a)flashrom.org Trying to unmap a nonexisting mapping! Please report a bug at flashrom(a)flashrom.org Trying to unmap a nonexisting mapping! Please report a bug at flashrom(a)flashrom.org Trying to unmap a nonexisting mapping! Please report a bug at flashrom(a)flashrom.org Trying to unmap a nonexisting mapping! Please report a bug at flashrom(a)flashrom.org Trying to unmap a nonexisting mapping! Please report a bug at flashrom(a)flashrom.org Trying to unmap a nonexisting mapping! Please report a bug at flashrom(a)flashrom.org Reading flash... done. x60s@x60s-ThinkPad-X60s:~/Downloads/libreboot_bin/flashrom$

5 years, 11 months

[commit] r1849 - trunk

by repository service

Author: stefanct Date: Fri Sep 5 18:14:11 2014 New Revision: 1849 URL: http://flashrom.org/trac/flashrom/changeset/1849 Log: dmi.c: Duplicate returned strings because they are meant to be freed. Without this patch dmi_shutdown calls free() on read-only strings. Signed-off-by: Stefan Tauner <stefan.tauner(a)alumni.tuwien.ac.at> Acked-by: Carl-Daniel Hailfinger <c-d.hailfinger.devel.2006(a)gmx.net> Modified: trunk/dmi.c Modified: trunk/dmi.c ============================================================================== --- trunk/dmi.c Sun Aug 31 02:09:21 2014 (r1848) +++ trunk/dmi.c Fri Sep 5 18:14:11 2014 (r1849) @@ -120,18 +120,18 @@ size_t i, len; if (string_id == 0) - return "Not Specified"; + return strdup("Not Specified"); while (string_id > 1 && string_id--) { if (buf >= limit) { msg_perr("DMI table is broken (string portion out of bounds)!\n"); - return "<OUT OF BOUNDS>"; + return strdup("<OUT OF BOUNDS>"); } buf += strnlen(buf, limit - buf) + 1; } if (!*buf) /* as long as the current byte we're on isn't null */ - return "<BAD INDEX>"; + return strdup("<BAD INDEX>"); len = strnlen(buf, limit - buf); char *newbuf = malloc(len + 1);

5 years, 11 months

Question about flashrom

by false

To whom it may concern : Hello, I read some command code about using the software but I didn't understand clearly how I can use it to read/write memory chips through FT2232D SPI port! Would you tell me how I can use it? or send an useful manual ... Thanks a lot...

5 years, 11 months

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

flashrom September 2014