j
: Next unread message k
: Previous unread message j a
: Jump to all threads
j l
: Jump to MailingList overview
When looking at qemu -mac99 I noticed that there are two nvram entries in openbios:
The first one (nvram@fff04000) has initialized .properties while the other one has words.
0 > dev / ls ... fff75e24 pci@f2000000 fff77848 nvram@fff04000 fff778e0 nvram ok 0 > dev /nvram@fff04000 ok 0 > words ok 0 > .properties name "nvram" #bytes 2000 reg fff04000 00004000 device_type "nvram" compatible "nvram,flash" ok 0 > dev /nvram@0 ok 0 > words close open seek write read size ok 0 > .properties name "nvram" ok
Attached patch fixes initialization, so only one node is created containing both .properties and words.
0 > dev / ls ... fff75e24 pci@f2000000 fff77868 nvram@fff04000 ok 0 > dev /nvram@fff04000 ok 0 > words close open seek write read size ok 0 > .properties name "nvram" #bytes 2000 reg fff04000 00004000 device_type "nvram" compatible "nvram,flash" ok
Signed-off-by: Amadeusz Sławiński amade@asmblr.net
Attachments:
On 28/01/13 11:35, Amadeusz Sławiński wrote:
When looking at qemu -mac99 I noticed that there are two nvram entries in openbios:
The first one (nvram@fff04000) has initialized .properties while the other one has words.
0> dev / ls ... fff75e24 pci@f2000000 fff77848 nvram@fff04000 fff778e0 nvram ok 0> dev /nvram@fff04000 ok 0> words ok 0> .properties name "nvram" #bytes 2000 reg fff04000 00004000 device_type "nvram" compatible "nvram,flash" ok 0> dev /nvram@0 ok 0> words close open seek write read size ok 0> .properties name "nvram" ok
Attached patch fixes initialization, so only one node is created containing both .properties and words.
0> dev / ls ... fff75e24 pci@f2000000 fff77868 nvram@fff04000 ok 0> dev /nvram@fff04000 ok 0> words close open seek write read size ok 0> .properties name "nvram" #bytes 2000 reg fff04000 00004000 device_type "nvram" compatible "nvram,flash" ok
Signed-off-by: Amadeusz Sławińskiamade@asmblr.net
This patch looks good to me. Can you resubmit with a comment in exactly the same style as the existing entries in "git log" and then I can apply it?
Many thanks,
Mark.