On Apr 26, 2016, at 4:11 PM, BALATON Zoltan
On Tue, 26 Apr 2016, Programmingkid wrote:
This patch makes booting Mac OS 9.2 possible. It
> r and r> with sub_>r and sub_r>. This allows for the return stack
> to be left
Can we have Segher's Forth version of this instead:
That should be equivalent and would make the C code much simpler and
allow dropping most of these patches.
That code doesn't work. It causes a "Dictionary space overflow" message
to be printed. My code does work.
Maybe you need to increase the available cells to have enough space? I
don't know much about Forth to understand the code better.