j
: Next unread message k
: Previous unread message j a
: Jump to all threads
j l
: Jump to MailingList overview
On 2013-Apr-8 15:00 , Artyom Tarasenko wrote:
I guess ihandle>phandle shouldn't be called for the root entry. What do you think?
You're probably calling ihandle>phandle with a phandle. I would expect the return from active-package to be a phandle, not an ihandle.
On Mon, Apr 8, 2013 at 9:15 PM, Tarl Neustaedter tarl-b2@tarl.net wrote:
On 2013-Apr-8 15:00 , Artyom Tarasenko wrote:
I guess ihandle>phandle shouldn't be called for the root entry. What do you think?
You're probably calling ihandle>phandle with a phandle. I would expect the return from active-package to be a phandle, not an ihandle.
You are absolutely right. Removing ihandle>phandle helped. Thanks a lot!
-- Regards, Artyom Tarasenko
linux/sparc and solaris/sparc under qemu blog: http://tyom.blogspot.com/search/label/qemu