j
: Next unread message k
: Previous unread message j a
: Jump to all threads
j l
: Jump to MailingList overview
There are some advantages to joining GNU: Publicity, which means more contributors Credibility, which may get MB manufacturers to evaluate the code sooner
On the other hand, RMS is petty about semantics. I think that not being allowed to use the term "open source" is silly. And then there's the restriction about "GNU/Linux" vs "Linux" which presents special problems for the OpenBIOS project becase the BIOS software is generally concerned with the kernel rather than with the whole OS. RMS might not be too pleased about us calling Linux "Linux" even though we really only mean the kernel, in cases where we *could* mean the OS.
I'm not opposed to joining GNU, but doing so will entail putting up with RMS's politics and rants.
M
On Wed, 3 Feb 1999, M Carling wrote:
There are some advantages to joining GNU: Publicity, which means more contributors Credibility, which may get MB manufacturers to evaluate the code sooner
Well - I think we should stop GNU as a topic _now_ until we have some very good starting point for coding, a direction, principle thoughts done. What we really have for now is some code initializing the PCI bridge or other I/O (I didn't dig into) - that's it. That's not a skeleton, not the skin, it's just the kidney. But at first, to give the project any purpose, we should have at least (a) a skeleton and (b) a principle thought of how the "thing" should look and interact afterwards. Without that, any piece of code is useless (of course, until it fits into the structure finally decided).
Winscheichwos, - Matthias