3 May
2013
3 May
'13
11:54 p.m.
On Fri, May 03, 2013 at 05:50:39PM -0400, Programmingkid wrote:
I see that you used a loop to simulate a wait time. I think there must be a better way of doing it. Doesn't the Sparc emulator have access to a hardware clock that we can use instead of a loop?
I would have thought the compiler was allowed to optimize away a loop that incremented something that noone ever looks at. It doesn't do anything after all.
--
Len Sorensen