24 May
2015
24 May
'15
noon
On 22/05/15 22:38, Programmingkid wrote:
On May 22, 2015, at 5:01 PM, Cormac O'Brien wrote:
Not really anything, but it's not an accurate representation of the real copyright and could be misleading.
Then it sounds like the original patch is good enough. Not too many people are going to be looking thru some node for a copyright message when they could just read the license agreement instead.
I have to side with Cormac on this one. My concern would be that someone is distributing openbios-ppc in custom hardware outside of QEMU/OpenBIOS where things become murkier. At least here I can see the difference in intent between declaring an incorrect copyright string and injecting a dummy value in order to satisfy a particular client.
ATB,
Mark.