Re: [OpenBIOS] SOLVED: the mystery of Solaris on SPARC32 and the missing Forth arguments

[Mark Cave-Ayland]

Blue Swirl wrote:
> > Sadly I think that I've misunderstood something in my copy-and-paste quality
> > patch as SPARC32 Solaris boot seems to get *less* far than it did without
> > this patch, so my effort must have a fundamental bug somewhere...
>
> At least %fp is not loaded and return with 'retl' is not OK if the
> function is not a leaf.

Ah okay - so swap retl with plain ret? And can I just use %sp like the 
SPARC64 version?

ATB,

Mark.