Re: [OpenBIOS] Incorrect implementation of b?branch?

[Mark Cave-Ayland]

Blue Swirl wrote:
> Basically looks OK to my untrained eyes, except I wonder if there are
> sign extension functions in Forth.

Thanks for the review. The nearest things I can find are in section 
7.3.2.4 of forth/bootstrap/bootstrap.fs, but these are clearly just 
byte-swapping words.

I'm reasonably confident that it's safe to apply as its quite a small 
contained patch. However it may be worth someone with more Forth 
experience casting a quick eye over it to make sure I haven't done 
something too stupid...

ATB,

Mark.