Re: [OpenBIOS] Sparc64 OpenBIOS

[Tarl Neustaedter]

Nick Couchman wrote:
> > [....]
> > cif: seek    ( low,high ihandle -- status )
>
> So, is this a change that needs to be made in the OpenBIOS forth code, in the Qemu code, or somewhere else??

It looks like the forth code is simply wrong. The first few tokens in 
forth/system/ciface.fs:seek are clearly expecting arguments in the wrong 
order ("swap rot dup ihandle>phandle" expects ihandle in the 3rd 
argument rather than 1st). The question is what in OpenBios depends on 
that misbehaviour, and there I am very much out of my depth.