Re: [OpenBIOS] Incorrect implementation of b?branch?

[Blue Swirl]

On 2/27/09, Mark Cave-Ayland  wrote:
> Blue Swirl wrote:
> > Basically looks OK to my untrained eyes, except I wonder if there are
> > sign extension functions in Forth.
>
> Thanks for the review. The nearest things I can find are in section 7.3.2.4
> of forth/bootstrap/bootstrap.fs, but these are clearly just byte-swapping
> words.

OK, then the patch is about optimal.
> I'm reasonably confident that it's safe to apply as its quite a small
> contained patch. However it may be worth someone with more Forth experience
> casting a quick eye over it to make sure I haven't done something too
> stupid...

I'm not suspecting of any problems either. I'll apply the patch,
thanks for your patience.