5 Jan
2013
5 Jan
'13
8:01 p.m.
On 05/01/13 19:43, Mark Cave-Ayland wrote:
If you could review, and perhaps even enhance with the relevant change for PPC64 then that would be great!
Actually here's a revised version that moves the __next_grab_slot back into C which is simpler still and continues to work for me. I guess in this form the same change could be applied as-is to hash_page_64()?
ATB,
Mark.