24 Oct
2010
24 Oct
'10
3:05 p.m.
Am 20.10.2010 um 21:04 schrieb Blue Swirl:
On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 6:36 PM, Andreas Färber <andreas.faerber@web.de
wrote: [...] Should we go ahead with my patch first and do the uint64_t -> target_phys_addr_t change as a follow-up patch? Or should I strip all changes to drivers/ from my patch?
The cell2pointer etc. changes look OK.
If there's no veto, I'll try committing patches 1-2 tonight.
Andreas
The address type changes (drivers/*) probably need a bit more thought, we are probably using a lot of wrong types (int vs. unsigned long vs. uint64_t).