Am 21.11.2010 um 14:09 schrieb Alexander Graf:
On 21.11.2010, at 14:00, Blue Swirl wrote:
On Sat, Nov 20, 2010 at 4:42 PM, Andreas Färber <andreas.faerber@web.de
wrote: Am 13.11.2010 um 10:25 schrieb Andreas Färber:
To avoid cast warnings, use a 64-bit ISA I/O base on ppc64.
v3:
- Adjust unix target, pointed out by Blue.
Unify ppc and sparc64, using unsigned long instead of uintptr_t. It is initialized from pci_arch_t, which uses unsigned long.
- Update other ppc targets, pointed out by Blue.
Ping. Opinions on which type is more correct to use here? Should we go with uintptr_t and change PCI instead?
For Sparc64, isa_io_base should be 64 bits. Any one of unsigned long, uintptr_t or phys_addr_t would be correct. Sparc32 does not use ISA, so that leaves the decision to PPC/PPC64.
I'm reasonably indifferent. On PPC32 we don't support memory > 32 bits IIRC. On PPC64, there's the theoretical possibility to have the isa base above 32 bits, so anything works really :).
Thanks guys, I went with the least invasive version then and applied it in r964.
Alex, if you could add an Acked-by or Reviewed-by for the uint16_t port patch, I'd apply that one as well. Getting closer to SLBs then!
Andreas