On 03/29/2011 09:35 AM, Joseph Smith wrote:
On Tue, 29 Mar 2011 09:17:35 -0400, Joseph Smithjoe@settoplinux.org wrote:
On Tue, 29 Mar 2011 08:56:19 -0400, Corey Osgoodcorey.osgood@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 8:08 AM, Joseph Smithjoe@settoplinux.org
wrote:
On Tue, 29 Mar 2011 05:17:50 -0600, Myles Watsonmylesgw@gmail.com
wrote:
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 2:34 AM, Joseph Smithjoe@settoplinux.org
wrote:
On Mon, 28 Mar 2011 22:51:23 -0600, Myles Watsonmylesgw@gmail.com
wrote:
>> Any other suggestions? > > Have you tried different host frequencies until you don't see
garbage?
> If you know the default value, you could try it first. >
Sorry for the ignorance but what do you mean by host frequencies?
Baudrate? Yes. That's all I meant.
Hmm, the baudrate that works fine with vendor bios is 115200 and that
is
what I have serialice set to, but I could play with other rates.
Could the clock generator between the southbridge and superio be doing something funny to scramble the signal?
Can you send a superiotool dump with the serial ports enabled and working? The registers say they're disabled in the one you sent.
Wow your right. That is really weird. This board is a little different anyways with one Winbond W83627HG SuperIO and 4 serial ports....
That is really strange cause I did that superiotool dump connected to the board over serial console. I wonder if there is another chip somewhere that handles the 4 serial ports???
Ah I am not going crazy :-) Looks like on the botton of the board is a fintek F81216DG LPC to 4 UART Chip (www.fintek.com.tw/files/productfiles/F81216_V032P.pdf). That is why the serial ports are disabled on the SuperIO. This should be interesting......got a datasheet to read. Thanks for the help everyone.