On Tue, 29 Mar 2011 09:17:35 -0400, Joseph Smith joe@settoplinux.org wrote:
On Tue, 29 Mar 2011 08:56:19 -0400, Corey Osgood corey.osgood@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 8:08 AM, Joseph Smith joe@settoplinux.org
wrote:
On Tue, 29 Mar 2011 05:17:50 -0600, Myles Watson mylesgw@gmail.com
wrote:
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 2:34 AM, Joseph Smith joe@settoplinux.org
wrote:
On Mon, 28 Mar 2011 22:51:23 -0600, Myles Watson mylesgw@gmail.com
wrote:
> Any other suggestions?
Have you tried different host frequencies until you don't see
garbage?
If you know the default value, you could try it first.
Sorry for the ignorance but what do you mean by host frequencies?
Baudrate? Yes. That's all I meant.
Hmm, the baudrate that works fine with vendor bios is 115200 and that
is
what I have serialice set to, but I could play with other rates.
Could the clock generator between the southbridge and superio be doing something funny to scramble the signal?
Can you send a superiotool dump with the serial ports enabled and working? The registers say they're disabled in the one you sent.
Wow your right. That is really weird. This board is a little different anyways with one Winbond W83627HG SuperIO and 4 serial ports....
That is really strange cause I did that superiotool dump connected to the board over serial console. I wonder if there is another chip somewhere that handles the 4 serial ports???