[OpenBIOS] [PATCH 0/4] Changes for MorphOS

BALATON Zoltan balaton at eik.bme.hu
Sat Mar 8 14:48:02 CET 2014


On Sat, 8 Mar 2014, Mark Cave-Ayland wrote:
> This patch looks fine, so I've just applied this to the main repository (with 
> credit to Oliver).

Thanks.

> I would say do a separate patchset with patches 1 and 4 with CC to the PPC 
> maintainers (Alex and Andreas) and make sure that they are happy with the 
> changes.

OK, I will do so after I came up with a hopefully final version. I may 
need to change them still.

> Patch 2 is little more tricky; I'd be tempted to move the "OpenBIOS" version 
> to another property in the root node of the tree and set it to "device-tree" 
> for compatibility reasons. Then again I'm finding it quite hard to justify

I don't mind which solution will be chosen as long as we can match the 
Apple behaviour on PPC. I see these alternatives:

1. My first version was to change it for all but this does not seem to be 
the right choice.

2. Mark's suggestion was to move the current value to some other property 
and change the name. If we choose this we need to decide the name of the 
new property. My suggestion for this was "vendor" but this is just a guess 
based on nothing and I'm open to other suggestions. If we agree on a name 
I can prepare a patch. Does the name of the root node actually matters to 
anyone on platforms other than Apple?

3. I may look into enclosing it in [IFDEF] CONFIG_PPC or even patching it 
up in qemu/init.c based on what is_apple returns but does it worth the 
hassle?

Regards,
BALATON Zoltan



More information about the OpenBIOS mailing list