[flashrom] [PATCH] Fix erase-blocks specification for the Atmel AT49F002(N)(T)

[Carl-Daniel Hailfinger]

On 23.01.2010 18:59, Uwe Hermann wrote:
> Anyway, the attached patch is more correct than svn anyway (unless I
> read the datasheet wrong), so we should apply it nevertheless IMHO.
>   

Could you please regenerate the patch with at least 17 lines of context?
Otherwise it is very difficult to review without applying it (no chip
name/ID in the patch).

To generate a diff with 17 lines of context in svn:
svn diff -x -U17 --diff-cmd diff

Thanks!

Regards,
Carl-Daniel

-- 
Developer quote of the year:
"We are juggling too many chainsaws and flaming arrows and tigers."