[flashrom] [PATCH] Fix erase-blocks specification for the Atmel AT49F002(N)(T)
c-d.hailfinger.devel.2006 at gmx.net
Sat Jan 23 19:57:48 CET 2010
On 23.01.2010 18:59, Uwe Hermann wrote:
> Anyway, the attached patch is more correct than svn anyway (unless I
> read the datasheet wrong), so we should apply it nevertheless IMHO.
Could you please regenerate the patch with at least 17 lines of context?
Otherwise it is very difficult to review without applying it (no chip
name/ID in the patch).
To generate a diff with 17 lines of context in svn:
svn diff -x -U17 --diff-cmd diff
Developer quote of the year:
"We are juggling too many chainsaws and flaming arrows and tigers."
More information about the flashrom