[coreboot] [RFH] Status of the Lenovo X201

Kyösti Mälkki kyosti.malkki at gmail.com
Sat Apr 28 17:34:04 CEST 2018

On Sat, Apr 28, 2018 at 3:41 PM, Nicola Corna <nicola at corna.info> wrote:
> April 27, 2018 12:29 PM, "Nicola Corna" <nicola at corna.info> wrote:
>>> With config PARALLEL_CPU_INIT=y so SMP / SMM init in initialize_cpus()
>>> will never call wait_other_cpus() at all. That actually regressed in
>>> my commit 0cc2ce4 [1] but I can't test if reverting it solves this for
>>> you. I'll push a regression fix soonish for review.
>>> [1] https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/21088
>>> Kyösti
>> I'm going to test https://review.coreboot.org/#/c/coreboot/+/25874 soon and
>> report back, thanks for your help.
> Unfortunately that patch dont't fix the issue (log attached).
> I've also tried 0cc2ce4 but with that revision it works correctly
> (log and config attached).
> If needed I can run a git bisect to find which commit broke the boot.

I thought I had seen some other message [1] on the list regarding
X201(i) not booting or resuming. Looking at your boot log ending on
"0:1f.0 final", it appears we are looking at the same commit which
adds INTEL_CHIPSET_LOCKDOWN implementation in lpc_final(). The commit
message tells it was not tested for ibexpeak so you may want to try
revert that one before going for full bisect.

[1] https://mail.coreboot.org/pipermail/coreboot/2018-April/086564.html
[2] https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/21129


More information about the coreboot mailing list