[coreboot] Add me_cleaner to automated tests?

[Zoran Stojsavljevic]

> I've told my wife that every time she buys a pair of shoes, I get to buy
a new computer.
>  It works out well for both of us, but she's still winning.  :)

You should change the rule. You should buy a sport car for each pair of
shoes. ;-)

Zoran

On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 2:45 AM, Martin Roth <gaumless at gmail.com> wrote:

> Here's the list of boards I've got for coreboot testing.
>
> https://www.coreboot.org/User:MartinRoth#Platforms_supported_by_coreboot
>
> My plan is to get as many of these as I can set up for automated testing.
>
> When new boards are added to the tree, I try to buy them if possible,
> but that's a lot of boards.  I've told my wife that every time she
> buys a pair of shoes, I get to buy a new computer.  It works out well
> for both of us, but she's still winning.  :)
>
> Martin
>
> On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 6:07 PM, Sam Kuper <sam.kuper at uclmail.net> wrote:
> > Good to hear :)
> >
> > Does the Coreboot project already have an actual physical board for
> > every board listed at https://www.coreboot.org/Supported_Motherboards
> > ? If not, is there a list of which physical boards the project has
> > (or, conversely, is lacking)?
> >
> > Thank you for answering all these questions!
> >
> > P.S. I notice you replied to me individually rather than to the list.
> > If that was not intentional, please feel free to CC the list in your
> > reply :)
> >
> >
> > On 21/03/2017, Martin Roth <gaumless at gmail.com> wrote:
> >> Well, ultimately, we'd like to have every board in the coreboot tree
> >> tested automatically, if not for every commit, at least daily.  So in
> >> that respect, It's on the roadmap.  It's just slow going.  Currently
> >> only a single configuration is tested, so that's something that would
> >> need to be updated as well.  Once that happens, I don't have any
> >> problem with testing a cut-down ME.
> >>
> >> Martin
> >>
> >> On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 2:49 PM, Sam Kuper <sam.kuper at uclmail.net>
> wrote:
> >>> On 21/03/2017, Martin Roth <gaumless at gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>> Most of our current automated testing is just build testing, although
> >>>> we're working to expand that.  The boot testing we DO have doesn't
> >>>> currently include any boards with an ME - they're currently all boards
> >>>> that don't require any blobs.
> >>>
> >>> Thanks for the info :)
> >>>
> >>> Is it on Coreboot's roadmap to do automated boot testing of boards
> >>> that have a Management Engine? If so, is my suggestion to also test
> >>> for incompatibilities with me_cleaner a feasible one?
> >>>
> >>> Thanks again :)
> >>
>
> --
> coreboot mailing list: coreboot at coreboot.org
> https://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.coreboot.org/pipermail/coreboot/attachments/20170322/669e4e3e/attachment.html>