[coreboot] SPD binaries in coreboot

Nico Huber nico.h at gmx.de
Fri Oct 23 18:59:19 CEST 2015

On 23.10.2015 18:32, Martin Roth wrote:
>> So, is there a third option that I'm missing? Other opinions?
>>>> The third option would be a plain text format which is easy to parse
>>>> but still covers the spec well.
> I'd say that we should store the SPDs as binaries - these are easy to
> use at build time, and there's no reason to build them every time.
> They change, but infrequently.  Then we need a better tool.
That would also apply to a bootblock that needs a specific assembler or
romcc. Would you distribute that as a binary too?


More information about the coreboot mailing list