[coreboot] coreboot work

[Patrick Georgi]

Am 2014-04-04 19:59, schrieb Peter Stuge:
> Patrick Georgi wrote:
>> 9. at some point coreboot-experimental is either a success and becomes
>> the new master, or it’s not and vanishes (maybe after picking the good
>> ideas). Ideally this happens fast enough that master didn’t diverge 
>> too
>> badly.
>> 
>> Comments?
> 
> This sounds like a standard topic branch workflow which is what I
> thought we were using all along.
The deviation wrt topic branch workflow is to build a branch (where more 
than one feature can happen before we prove the things work) instead of 
gerrit topics, and that we allow (and formalize and encourage) a certain 
level of breakage in that branch. Essentially points 1 to 8 :-)


Regards,
Patrick