[coreboot] EP80579 reference platform

Stefan Reinauer stefan.reinauer at coresystems.de
Thu Apr 22 22:05:16 CEST 2010


Try tracing the original BIOS and coreboot with SerialICE and compare  
the differences ... It's a bunch of work but not as ugly as debugging  
ROMCC assembler output... :-) http://www.serialice.com/

Stefan

On 22.04.2010, at 20:16, Dustin Harrison <dustin.harrison at sutus.com>  
wrote:

> I did a diff of romstage.inc, using the same codebase (rev 5351) the  
> only difference between romcc 4051 and 5351 was the timestamp.  This  
> is consistent with my finding that compiling trunk with an older  
> romcc didn't help the situation.
>
> When I get done with my RAM timing I'll try an svn bisect to narrow  
> it down.
>
> Unfortunately I was not as lucky as Arnaud for timing.  I switched  
> to 2T and that didn't help.   Unfortunately I am using unbuffered  
> non-ECC SODIMMs and only have one slot unlike the truxton with ECC  
> DIMMs and two slots.  The proprietary Truxton BIOS boots this board  
> so I know there is hope, just need to nail the settings.
>
> Cheers
> Dustin
>
>
> On 21/04/2010 10:17 PM, Peter Stuge wrote:
>> Dustin Harrison wrote:
>>
>>> if anyone has some ideas I'll give them a shot in between hacking
>>> the RAM.
>>>
>> It would be interesting to also look at output from a recent version
>> of romcc compiling the old code, and an old romcc compiling the new
>> code. That could hint to either a romcc bug or something gone bad in
>> the coreboot code.
>>
>>
>> //Peter
>>
>>
>
> -- 
> coreboot mailing list: coreboot at coreboot.org
> http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot
>




More information about the coreboot mailing list