[LinuxBIOS] [PATCH] cleaned up MCP55 chipset code

Uwe Hermann uwe at hermann-uwe.de
Fri Feb 2 19:04:03 CET 2007


On Fri, Feb 02, 2007 at 10:32:08AM -0700, ron minnich wrote:
> On 2/2/07, Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer at coresystems.de> wrote:
> > committed-by can be retrieved from the svn system per revision.
> I guess I am not being clear. What I want to see, in email, is that a
> fix got committed. We recently saw a bunch of patches hit the list,
> with signed-off-by, then acked-by, and then I have no idea if that
> particular set of patches was committed. So a committed-by would be
> useful to me. I'd like to see it in the same thread of mail that the
> discussion of the patches occurred in. Then I can look at the thread
> and even search for a committed-by.

I don't think we need an explicit Committed-by or similar tag, but a
short email saying that the patch was committed should suffice, right?

We mostly already do this anyways...

If we lose the overview of pending patches that is a clear sign that we
should use the tracker more often.

http://www.hermann-uwe.de  | http://www.holsham-traders.de
http://www.crazy-hacks.org | http://www.unmaintained-free-software.org
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://www.coreboot.org/pipermail/coreboot/attachments/20070202/61e2eb2b/attachment.sig>

More information about the coreboot mailing list