[SeaBIOS] [PATCH 2/2] accept MADT over fw_cfg
kraxel at redhat.com
Thu Mar 21 15:13:01 CET 2013
> But I'm not sure I see any point in doing it table-by-table. Surely it
> can be all or nothing?
It allows to merge changes piecewise and avoids piling up long patch
queues. It makes bisecting regressions easier. Also the logic "if
table $foo is provided by qemu, just use it, otherwise generate it / use
compiled-in" seems to be simple enougth.
But at the end of the day it is the call of the one actually doing the
work. Maybe I'm over-estimating the work needed to do the switch.
More information about the SeaBIOS