[SeaBIOS] [coreboot] [PATCH] SeaBIOS VGA hooks

Myles Watson mylesgw at gmail.com
Wed Jun 9 20:48:02 CEST 2010


On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 12:34 PM, Stefan Reinauer
<stefan.reinauer at coresystems.de> wrote:
> On 6/9/10 8:00 PM, Myles Watson wrote:
>> On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 1:45 AM, Stefan Reinauer
>> <stefan.reinauer at coresystems.de> wrote:
>>
>>> SeaBIOS VGA hooks for Getac P470 and Roda RK886EX notebooks
>>>
>> It seems surprising to want to make SeaBIOS have this much stuff
>> that's board-specific.
> int15 hooks are designed to be board specific.
>
>>  It seems like a more generic way to set hooks
>> from CBFS would be nice.
>>
> Loading an int handler dynamically from CBFS and linking it at runtime?
> Sounds doable but complex.
It may not be worth the trouble.

> As long as it's only 2 intel and a number of VIA based boards that
> require a special int15 handler it might not be that bad.
>
> Generally it's also possible to locally patch the SeaBIOS source code.
Sure.  Harder for end users, but just as easy for developers.

> The runtime distinction is only required if you want to use the same
> SeaBIOS binary on several mainboards that require to have different
> int15 handlers.
>
>> I'm thinking something like seabios/hooks which has a list of
>> interrupts handlers and where they should be installed.
>>
> It would need to be 0xe0000 - 0xfffff unless we want to start cutting
> out more memory.
I meant where as in what interrupt to patch, not what address to run
at.  SeaBIOS should be able to use whatever address it wants to.

> Alternatively we could add an SMI "function call" to coreboot that does
> the deed. That would simplify the code in SeaBIOS significantly but add
> more requirements for SMM.

I'm not sure what's best.  Maybe few enough boards will need their own
handlers that it doesn't really matter.

Thanks,
Myles



More information about the SeaBIOS mailing list