[OpenBIOS] [PATCH 6/10] Wrapped HFS+ incorrectly recognized

[William Hahne]

On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 5:56 AM, Mark Cave-Ayland <
mark.cave-ayland at siriusit.co.uk> wrote:

> On 09/08/11 22:54, William Hahne wrote:
>
>  The code for checking for a wrapped HFS+ volume looks at the wrong offset.
>>
>> Index: fs/hfsplus/hfsp_volume.c
>> ==============================**==============================**=======
>> --- fs/hfsplus/hfsp_volume.c (revision 1041)
>> +++ fs/hfsplus/hfsp_volume.c (working copy)
>> @@ -302,7 +302,7 @@
>> os_read(fd, vol, 2, HFSP_BLOCKSZ_BITS);
>> if (__be16_to_cpu(vol[0]) == HFS_VOLHEAD_SIG &&
>> - __be16_to_cpu(vol[0x7c]) == HFSP_VOLHEAD_SIG) {
>> + __be16_to_cpu(vol[0x3e]) == HFSP_VOLHEAD_SIG) {
>> ret = -1;
>> } else if (__be16_to_cpu(vol[0]) == HFSP_VOLHEAD_SIG) {
>> ret = -1;
>>
>
> Same comment as for patch 2/10.
>
>
Actually I think this one is not contrary to the specification but is just a
mix up between a 8bit and 16bit array. The original value seems to assume
that vol is an array of 8bit integers while it is an array of 16bit
integers. If you notice the corrected value is half of the original value. I
can look up the documentation but it seems unnecessary in this case.


>
> ATB,
>
> Mark.
>
> --
> Mark Cave-Ayland - Senior Technical Architect
> PostgreSQL - PostGIS
> Sirius Corporation plc - control through freedom
> http://www.siriusit.co.uk
> t: +44 870 608 0063
>
> Sirius Labs: http://www.siriusit.co.uk/labs
>
> --
> OpenBIOS                 http://openbios.org/
> Mailinglist:  http://lists.openbios.org/**mailman/listinfo<http://lists.openbios.org/mailman/listinfo>
> Free your System - May the Forth be with you
>

William Hahne
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openbios.org/pipermail/openbios/attachments/20110810/359d06c4/attachment.html>