[OpenBIOS] [PATCH 3/3] Don't assume that pointer and cell size are identical
andreas.faerber at web.de
Sun Oct 24 17:05:40 CEST 2010
Am 20.10.2010 um 21:04 schrieb Blue Swirl:
> On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 6:36 PM, Andreas Färber <andreas.faerber at web.de
> > wrote:
>> [...] Should we go ahead with my patch first and do the uint64_t ->
>> target_phys_addr_t change as a follow-up patch? Or should I strip all
>> changes to drivers/ from my patch?
> The cell2pointer etc. changes look OK.
If there's no veto, I'll try committing patches 1-2 tonight.
> The address type changes
> (drivers/*) probably need a bit more thought, we are probably using a
> lot of wrong types (int vs. unsigned long vs. uint64_t).
More information about the OpenBIOS