[OpenBIOS] [PATCH 3/3] Don't assume that pointer and cell size are identical
blauwirbel at gmail.com
Wed Oct 20 21:04:36 CEST 2010
On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 6:36 PM, Andreas Färber <andreas.faerber at web.de> wrote:
> Am 20.10.2010 um 18:19 schrieb Blue Swirl:
>> On Sun, Oct 17, 2010 at 11:18 PM, Andreas Färber <andreas.faerber at web.de>
>>> On ppc64, cell size is 32 bits but pointers are 64-bit. Thus, direct
>>> result in warnings, treated as errors.
>>> Use [u]intptr_t cast or cell2pointer and pointer2cell macros as
>>> -int uart_init(uint64_t port, unsigned long speed)
>>> +int uart_init(uintptr_t port, unsigned long speed)
>> This is not correct. The physical addresses on Sparc32 are really 36
>> bits wide, so uintptr_t is not wide enough.
> Okay, then I'll revert this one. The patch may be mechanical to _review_ but
> it's pretty invasive, so I'd rather have some parts of it committed before
> running into larger merge conflicts.
>> For that, we'd need a
>> physical address type. We could reuse for example QEMU name,
> Sounds good. Should we go ahead with my patch first and do the uint64_t ->
> target_phys_addr_t change as a follow-up patch? Or should I strip all
> changes to drivers/ from my patch?
The cell2pointer etc. changes look OK. The address type changes
(drivers/*) probably need a bit more thought, we are probably using a
lot of wrong types (int vs. unsigned long vs. uint64_t).
More information about the OpenBIOS