[OpenBIOS] [PATCH] Rename conflicting hfsplus files
andreas.faerber at web.de
Sun Nov 28 18:16:58 CET 2010
Am 28.11.2010 um 15:50 schrieb Blue Swirl:
> On Sun, Nov 21, 2010 at 1:52 PM, Andreas Färber <andreas.faerber at web.de
> > wrote:
>> Am 21.11.2010 um 13:33 schrieb Blue Swirl:
>>> On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 2:15 AM, Segher Boessenkool
>>> <segher at kernel.crashing.org> wrote:
>>>>> Sounds to me like the real problem is with how ar is used, then?
>>>>> Can you show the ar commands that fail?
>>>> Oh I see now. ar doesn't store pathname.
>>>> If you can require a new enough binutils (2.19 or newer), you could
>>>> use "thin archives", which don't have this limitation, and have
>>>> some more advantages. See the -T option to ar (ar rcsT bla.a ...)
>>>> Another option is to have an archive file per directory.
>>> The object files could be renamed before archiving, or GCC -o target
>>> could be different from what simple %o: %.c substitution rule would
>>> But googling for the project finds very few references, most of them
>>> are OpenBIOS. This seems to be the source:
>>> It's stale, but I found it here:
>>> in the project hfsplusutils. Linux fs/hfsplus seems to be very
>>> So I think renaming would be the easiest solution, in the unlikely
>>> event that hfsplusutils project revives we can still pretty easily
>> The patch once again is line-wrapped  unfortunately. It would be
>> nice if
>> you could push such patches to your http://repo.or.cz/w/openbios.git
>> repository (or wherever) for testing.
> Pushed, please test.
Thanks, works for me. The slight dissimilarity with the original files
stems from whitespace changes.
Acked-by: Andreas Färber <andreas.faerber at web.de>
I would suggest to rename unicode.c and blockiter.c, too, though.
Might bite in the future.
More information about the OpenBIOS