segher at chello.nl
Sun Jun 23 04:05:28 CEST 2002
> I strongly suggest to apply this patch - this would allow a lot
> more people to use paflof and probably get this compiled on
> almost any host system.
> Please comment on the patch. If there is no good reason against
> it, this is definitely the way to go.
Well no. It will still only compile on compilers that support GCC's
variable macro arg syntax and its computed-goto-to-label support; the
only compiler that works with all this is GCC (even icc won't work).
Oh, and named record initialization, too (a C99-ism).
If you send a patch that removes these dependencies while not getting
any performance loss (and the restrict's matter a lot, but there's not
enough of them at this exact moment), it'll sure be applied. But as
long as we require GCC anyway, I prefer using all C99 goodies that ease
I'll look into the auto-config-types thingie sometime soonish, btw.
Yes I'm slow these days, sorry.
To unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo at freiburg.linux.de
with 'unsubscribe openbios' in the body of the message
http://www.freiburg.linux.de/OpenBIOS/ - free your system..
More information about the openbios