[flashrom] Namespace prefix for libflashrom
Antonio Ospite
ao2 at ao2.it
Mon Apr 24 10:12:58 CEST 2017
On Sun, 23 Apr 2017 15:54:50 -0700
David Hendricks <david.hendricks at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 23, 2017 at 7:07 AM, Stefan Tauner <stefan.tauner at gmx.at> wrote:
>
> > On Sat, 22 Apr 2017 11:16:18 -0700
> > David Hendricks <david.hendricks at gmail.com> wrote:
[...]
> > I'd love to hear some arguments about your preferences.
>
>
> I'd be fine with libflashrom_. Since it seems there is no definitive
> favorite short prefix I think we should just forget about those and use a
> longer one. And in the grand scheme of things neither libflashrom_ nor
> flashrom_ are very long.
>
After hearing the arguments on the list I too formed an opinion about
the matter, my preference list is:
- flashrom_ (the lib prefix is redundant IMHO, lot of libraries omit
it in the API, e.g.: libglib, libgtk);
- libflashrom_ (I would tolerate it, it's still better than cryptic
prefixes);
and maybe one I didn't see:
- libfr_ (flash-rom is two words, so "fr" as abbreviation makes sense,
but there's really no need to be so concise).
Ciao ciao,
Antonio
--
Antonio Ospite
https://ao2.it
https://twitter.com/ao2it
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
More information about the flashrom
mailing list